IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1799-d742279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and Optimization of Water–Food–Energy Nexus for Malaysia’s Agricultural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Siah

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Haslinda Zabiri

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    CO2 Research center (CO2RES), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

The water–food–energy (WFE) nexus is a strategic system that integrates different separated sectors by using their interconnectedness to reduce trade-offs and allow sustainable development by preventing future resource insecurity. Traditionally, the water, energy, and food sectors operate individually and result in different challenges such as resource scarcity, conflicts in the uses of upstream and downstream hydro systems, and power supply crises due to serious water pollution. Reports so far have only implemented the WFE nexus in countries and cities outside of Malaysia. In addition, there is yet to be a model in literature revolving only on optimizing the agricultural sector’s resources distribution. Hence, this paper aims to develop the first systematic and integrated model for optimal planning of resource allocation in Malaysia’s agricultural sector. The novelty and contribution of this research could be concluded as: (1) multi-objective planning incorporating economic and environmental factors such as economic benefits and carbon emission limit, (2) focusing on the agricultural sector considering geologically-specific crops, livestock, and residents, (3) considering the potential waste recycle systems including wastewater treatment and biomass treatment. The superstructure framework developed based on the case study in Perak, Malaysia aids the implementation of the WFE nexus system locally where trade-offs and synergies between the different sub-units are modelled. From the results, it can be concluded that irrigated paddy crops could contribute to a higher profit compared to palm oil and rubber crops. Thus, future development can be focused on irrigated paddy crops while meeting other constraints and demands to ensure the resources are optimally utilized. The multi-objective optimization solved using MINIMAX algorithm also provides decision-makers with a guideline on how to implement WFE nexus locally in the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Siah & Haslinda Zabiri, 2022. "Modeling and Optimization of Water–Food–Energy Nexus for Malaysia’s Agricultural Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1799-:d:742279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damour, C. & Hamdi, M. & Josset, C. & Auvity, B. & Boillereaux, L., 2012. "Energy analysis and optimization of a food defrosting system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 562-570.
    2. Howe, Paul, 2019. "The triple nexus: A potential approach to supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhattacharya, Madhuchhanda & Basak, Tanmay, 2013. "A theoretical study on the use of microwaves in reducing energy consumption for an endothermic reaction: Role of metal coated bounding surface," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 278-294.
    2. Bhattacharya, Madhuchhanda & Basak, Tanmay, 2016. "A review on the susceptor assisted microwave processing of materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 306-338.
    3. Yuqing Liao & Yongchao Ma & Jingliang Chen & Ruirui Liu, 2020. "Evaluation of the Level of Sustainable Development of Provinces in China from 2012 to 2018: A Study Based on the Improved Entropy Coefficient-TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    4. David Horan, 2020. "National Baselines for Integrated Implementation of an Environmental Sustainable Development Goal Assessed in a New Integrated SDG Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Louis J. Kotzé & Rakhyun E. Kim, 2022. "Towards planetary nexus governance in the Anthropocene: An earth system law perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S3), pages 86-97, December.
    6. Alamir, M. & Witrant, E. & Della Valle, G. & Rouaud, O. & Josset, Ch. & Boillereaux, L., 2013. "Estimation of energy saving thanks to a reduced-model-based approach: Example of bread baking by jet impingement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 74-82.
    7. Papasidero, Davide & Pierucci, Sauro & Manenti, Flavio, 2016. "Energy optimization of bread baking process undergoing quality constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1417-1422.
    8. Pascucci, Elisa, 2021. "More logistics, less aid: Humanitarian-business partnerships and sustainability in the refugee camp," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Asadikia, Atie & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen, 2021. "Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: Machine learning approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório Andrade Guerra & Michele Hoffmann & Ritanara Tayane Bianchet & Patrícia Medeiros & Ana Paula Provin & Roberto Iunskovski, 2022. "Sustainable development goals and ethics: building “the future we want”," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9407-9428, July.
    11. Eugenia Baroncelli, 2023. "Implementing the Humanitarian‐development‐peace nexus in a post‐pandemic world: Multilateral cooperation and the challenge of inter‐organisational dialogue," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S2), pages 22-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1799-:d:742279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.