IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13842-d952606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends in Mathematical Literacy Research via Knowledge Graph

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohong Chen

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Jincheng Zhou

    (School of Computer and Information, Institute of Big Data Application and Artificial Intelligence, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China
    Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Guizhou Province, Duyun 558000, China
    Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Qiannan, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Jinqiu Wang

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Dan Wang

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Jiu Liu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Dingpu Shi

    (School of Computer and Information, Institute of Big Data Application and Artificial Intelligence, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Duo Yang

    (School of Computer and Information, Institute of Big Data Application and Artificial Intelligence, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Qingna Pan

    (School of Computer and Information, Institute of Big Data Application and Artificial Intelligence, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

Abstract

The goal of education for sustainable development is to prepare future citizens to make informed decisions and take responsible action to solve problems. The purpose of mathematical literacy is to ensure that all learners develop an understanding of mathematics, and how to relate mathematics to the world and use mathematical knowledge to make valuable decisions in their lives, work, and society. It can be seen that the purpose of mathematical literacy coincides with the goal of education for sustainable development. In addition, math literacy is closely related to self-regulated learning (SRL), which is the key to meaningful learning and sustainable development. In educational research, it is an essential task to cultivate learners’ mathematical literacy and promote their sustainable development. With the rapid growth of emerging technologies, the emergence of big data has brought numerous challenges to various research fields. In the age of big data, educational research that can identify research perspectives and hotspots and summarize research evolution rules from a large body of literature can assist us in deepening subsequent analysis. As a result, in this study, we used CiteSpace and HistCite knowledge map visualization and exploration technology to examine mathematical literacy research trends, major research countries and regions, major research institutions, significant researchers, highly cited papers, research hotspots, and evolution trends on a global scale. Through this study, we found that the earliest literature on mathematical literacy appeared in 1957, and the research on mathematical literacy can be divided into three germination stages (1957–2001), a slow development stage (2001–2011), and a prosperous development stage (2011–2022). Most studies come from developed countries such as the US, the UK, Germany, and Australia. The Universities of Utrecht and Purdue University were the most published institutions, and scholars at Purpura published the most articles. The research object of highly cited literature is mainly children, and the research is primarily carried out through the measurement of students’ mathematical ability and achievement and the analysis of related influencing factors, which provides a direction for how to improve students’ mathematical literacy. The research on mathematical literacy mainly includes four research hotspots: working memory and mathematical literacy; brain science and mathematical literacy; mathematical achievement and mathematical literacy; and the generation strategy of mathematical literacy. The research field of mathematics literacy mainly includes working memory, parietal cortex, math performance, mathematics education, early childhood, parental belief, fractions, cognitive development, and student learning. There are 10 clusters. Different clusters have different evolutionary trends. With the evolution of time, working memory, mathematical education, fractions, and precinct beliefs clustered, gradually expanding from the concentrated research direction to the subdivision field. The clusters of parietal cortex, math performance, early childhood, cognitive development, and students do not show large keyword nodes during the research period. With time, it has gradually expanded from the centralized research direction to the subdivision field. The parietal cortex, math performance, early childhood, cognitive development, and students clusters did not show large keyword nodes during the whole study period.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohong Chen & Jincheng Zhou & Jinqiu Wang & Dan Wang & Jiu Liu & Dingpu Shi & Duo Yang & Qingna Pan, 2022. "Visualizing Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends in Mathematical Literacy Research via Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13842-:d:952606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13842/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13842/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    2. Garfield, Eugene, 2009. "From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 173-179.
    3. Yating Zhao & Jingjing Guo & Chao Bao & Changyong Liang & Hemant K Jain, 2020. "Knowledge Graph Analysis of Human Health Research Related to Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Ramón García-Perales & Ascensión Palomares-Ruiz, 2020. "Education in Programming and Mathematical Learning: Functionality of a Programming Language in Educational Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Dingpu Shi & Jincheng Zhou & Dan Wang & Xiaopeng Wu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Duomin Wang & Yubin Huangfu & Zuoji Dong & Yiqi Dong, 2022. "Research Hotspots and Evolution Trends of Carbon Neutrality—Visual Analysis of Bibliometrics Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingna Pan & Jincheng Zhou & Duo Yang & Dingpu Shi & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2023. "Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linchao Huang & Jincheng Zhou & Dan Wang & Fang Wang & Jiu Liu & Dingpu Shi & Xiaohong Chen & Duo Yang & Qingna Pan, 2023. "Visualization Analysis of Global Self-Regulated Learning Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends Based on Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Ziwen Wei & Man Yuan, 2023. "Research on the Current Situation and Future Development Trend of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Field of Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    4. Zhichao Wang & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Performance Analysis of Hospitals in Australia and its Peers: A Systematic Review," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    5. Mehdi Toloo & Rouhollah Khodabandelou & Amar Oukil, 2022. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Fractional Programming (1965–2020)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Pan, Xuelian & Yan, Erjia & Cui, Ming & Hua, Weina, 2018. "Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 481-493.
    7. Xingyun Yan & Lingyu Wang & Mingzhu Fang & Jie Hu, 2022. "How Can Industrial Parks Achieve Carbon Neutrality? Literature Review and Research Prospect Based on the CiteSpace Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Yawen Zou & Manfred D Laubichler, 2018. "From systems to biology: A computational analysis of the research articles on systems biology from 1992 to 2013," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    10. Xiaomei Luo & Yuduo Wu & Lina Niu & Lucheng Huang, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Jingwei Han & Zhixiong Tan & Maozhi Chen & Liang Zhao & Ling Yang & Siying Chen, 2022. "Carbon Footprint Research Based on Input–Output Model—A Global Scientometric Visualization Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Itsuki Kageyama & Karin Kurata & Shuto Miyashita & Yeongjoo Lim & Shintaro Sengoku & Kota Kodama, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Jie Gao & Wu Zhang & Chunbaixue Yang & Qun Wang & Rui Yuan & Rui Wang & Limiao Zhang & Zhijian Li & Xiaoli Luo, 2023. "A Comparative Study of China’s Carbon Neutrality Policy and International Research Keywords under the Background of Decarbonization Plans in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Tosi, Mauro Dalle Lucca & dos Reis, Julio Cesar, 2021. "SciKGraph: A knowledge graph approach to structure a scientific field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    15. Kai Hu & Kunlun Qi & Siluo Yang & Shengyu Shen & Xiaoqiang Cheng & Huayi Wu & Jie Zheng & Stephen McClure & Tianxing Yu, 2018. "Identifying the “Ghost City” of domain topics in a keyword semantic space combining citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 1141-1157, March.
    16. Qingna Pan & Jincheng Zhou & Duo Yang & Dingpu Shi & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2023. "Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Qiong Dang & Zhongming Luo & Chuhao Ouyang & Lin Wang, 2021. "First Systematic Review on Health Communication Using the CiteSpace Software in China: Exploring Its Research Hotspots and Frontiers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Duo Yang & Jincheng Zhou & Dingpu Shi & Qingna Pan & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Global Digital Education via Knowledge Graph Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    20. Paweł Kut & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Martina Zeleňáková, 2024. "Assessing the Role of Hydrogen in Sustainable Energy Futures: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Research and International Collaborations in Energy and Environmental Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13842-:d:952606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.