IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12417-d929287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elastic Hop Count Trickle Timer Algorithm in Internet of Things

Author

Listed:
  • Raja Masadeh

    (Department of Computer Science, Information Technology Faculty, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Amman P.O. Box 1101, Jordan)

  • Bayan AlSaaidah

    (Department of Computer Science, Prince Abdullah bin Ghazi Faculty of Information Technology and Communications, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt P.O. Box 19117, Jordan)

  • Esraa Masadeh

    (Independent Researcher, Amman P.O. Box 1101, Jordan)

  • Moh’d Rasoul Al-Hadidi

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt P.O. Box 19117, Jordan)

  • Omar Almomani

    (Department of Computer Network and Information Systems, Information Technology Faculty, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Amman P.O. Box 11947, Jordan)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a technology that allows machines to communicate with each other without the need for human interaction. Usually, IoT devices are connected via a network. A wide range of network technologies are required to make the IoT concept operate successfully; as a result, protocols at various network layers are used. One of the most extensively used network layer routing protocols is the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL). One of the primary components of RPL is the trickle timer method. The trickle algorithm directly impacts the time it takes for control messages to arrive. It has a listen-only period, which causes load imbalance and delays for nodes in the trickle algorithm. By making the trickle timer method run dynamically based on hop count, this research proposed a novel way of dealing with the difficulties of the traditional algorithm, which is called the Elastic Hop Count Trickle Timer Algorithm. Simulation experiments have been implemented using the Contiki Cooja 3.0 simulator to study the performance of RPL employing the dynamic trickle timer approach. Simulation results proved that the proposed algorithm outperforms the results of the traditional trickle algorithm, dynamic algorithm, and e-trickle algorithm in terms of consumed power, convergence time, and packet delivery ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Raja Masadeh & Bayan AlSaaidah & Esraa Masadeh & Moh’d Rasoul Al-Hadidi & Omar Almomani, 2022. "Elastic Hop Count Trickle Timer Algorithm in Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12417-:d:929287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Whitmore & Anurag Agarwal & Li Xu, 2015. "The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 261-274, April.
    2. Shancang Li & Li Da Xu & Shanshan Zhao, 2015. "The internet of things: a survey," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 243-259, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Rizwanullah & Hadeel Alsolai & Mohamed K. Nour & Amira Sayed A. Aziz & Mohamed I. Eldesouki & Amgad Atta Abdelmageed, 2023. "Hybrid Muddy Soil Fish Optimization-Based Energy Aware Routing in IoT-Assisted Wireless Sensor Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    3. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2018. "The Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey of Topics and Trends using Twitter Data and Topic Modeling," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190376, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Qinghua Zheng & Chutong Yang & Haijun Yang & Jianhe Zhou, 2020. "A Fast Exact Algorithm for Deployment of Sensor Nodes for Internet of Things," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 829-842, August.
    5. Damminda Alahakoon & Rashmika Nawaratne & Yan Xu & Daswin Silva & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Bhumika Gupta, 2023. "Self-Building Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Empower Big Data Analytics in Smart Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 221-240, February.
    6. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    7. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    8. Payam Hanafizadeh & Parastou Hatami & Morteza Analoui & Amir Albadvi, 2021. "Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business context," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1175-1243, December.
    9. Federica Cena & Luca Console & Assunta Matassa & Ilaria Torre, 2019. "Multi-dimensional intelligence in smart physical objects," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 383-404, April.
    10. Pan Wang & Ricardo Valerdi & Shangming Zhou & Ling Li, 2015. "Introduction: Advances in IoT research and applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 239-241, April.
    11. Shang, Juan & Li, Pengfei & Li, Ling & Chen, Yong, 2018. "The relationship between population growth and capital allocation in urbanization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 249-256.
    12. Jens Passlick & Sonja Dreyer & Daniel Olivotti & Lukas Grützner & Dennis Eilers & Michael H. Breitner, 2021. "Predictive maintenance as an internet of things enabled business model: A taxonomy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 67-87, March.
    13. Salvatore T. March & Gary D. Scudder, 2019. "Predictive maintenance: strategic use of IT in manufacturing organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 327-341, April.
    14. Belfiore, Alessandra & Cuccurullo, Corrado & Aria, Massimo, 2022. "IoT in healthcare: A scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Tussyadiah, Iis, 2020. "A review of research into automation in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Takano, Yasutomo & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2019. "Extracting commercialization opportunities of the Internet of Things: Measuring text similarity between papers and patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 45-68.
    17. Dameri, Renata Paola & Benevolo, Clara & Veglianti, Eleonora & Li, Yaya, 2019. "Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 26-41.
    18. Federica Cena & Silvia Likavec & Amon Rapp, 2019. "Real World User Model: Evolution of User Modeling Triggered by Advances in Wearable and Ubiquitous Computing," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1085-1110, October.
    19. Muhammad Tahir & Muhammad Sardaraz & Shakoor Muhammad & Muhammad Saud Khan, 2020. "A Lightweight Authentication and Authorization Framework for Blockchain-Enabled IoT Network in Health-Informatics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Emilia Ingemarsdotter & Ella Jamsin & Gerd Kortuem & Ruud Balkenende, 2019. "Circular Strategies Enabled by the Internet of Things—A Framework and Analysis of Current Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-37, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12417-:d:929287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.