IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12016-d922679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Environmental Impact of Lowering Dietary Crude Protein in Finishing Pig Diets—The Effect on Ammonia, Odour and Slurry Production

Author

Listed:
  • M. Elizabeth E. Ball

    (Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK)

  • Sam Smyth

    (John Thompson and Sons Ltd., 39 York Road, Belfast BT15 3GW, UK)

  • Violet E. Beattie

    (Devenish Nutrition, Lagan House, 19 Clarendon Road, Belfast BT1 3BG, UK)

  • Kelvin J. McCracken

    (Devenish Nutrition, Lagan House, 19 Clarendon Road, Belfast BT1 3BG, UK)

  • Ursula McCormack

    (Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK)

  • Ramon Muns

    (Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK)

  • Fred J. Gordon

    (John Thompson and Sons Ltd., 39 York Road, Belfast BT15 3GW, UK)

  • Raymond Bradford

    (Preferred Capital Management PCM, 4 Greenpark Lane, Lisburn BT27 4EL, UK)

  • L. Alanna Reid

    (Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK)

  • Elizabeth Magowan

    (Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK)

Abstract

Excess nitrogen excretion, ammonia and odour are environmental pollutants associated with pig production. Reducing dietary crude protein (CP) will lower the amount of nitrogen excreted, reducing the potential for ammonia emissions, if diets are adequately formulated to supply amino acids and production performance is maintained. Crude protein content in diets for finishing pigs has been lowered recently, but the quantitative effect of this reduction on ammonia, odour, and slurry output is not well-established. The relationship between ammonia and odour is equivocal, and the effect on slurry production is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of lowering dietary CP on ammonia emission, odour emission and slurry output of finishing pigs. Thirty entire boar pigs were individually housed in groups of six, from 10 weeks of age (30 ± 3.0 kg) and offered standard diets. At 75 kg (±1.5 kg) pigs were assigned to one of three treatment diets; (1) 180 g/kg CP, 11.0 g/kg total lysine (High CP), (2) 150 g/kg CP, 11.1 g/kg total lysine (Medium CP), and (3) 130 g/kg CP, 9.0 g/kg total lysine (Low CP). After three weeks on the experimental diets pigs were moved, six each week, to individual calorimetry chambers to measure ammonia and odour emissions. Pigs were offered treatment diets ad libitum. At the end of the recording period, the pigs were removed from the chamber, weighed and feed disappearance recorded to calculate intake. The slurry in each chamber was collected and analysed. The reduction in CP in the diet from 180 g/kg to 150 g/kg resulted in a 22% reduction in ammonia emissions, and from 180 g/kg to 130 g/kg resulted in a 47% reduction ( p < 0.001). Slurry output from pigs offered the 130 g/kg CP diet was reduced by 39% ( p < 0.001) and dry matter increased by 35% compared to slurry from pigs offered the 180 g/kg CP diet ( p < 0.05). Water usage ( p = 0.017), slurry output and nitrogen and phosphate in the slurry ( p < 0.05, respectively) were found to decrease linearly with decreasing dietary CP content. There was no significant effect of reducing CP on performance or odour emission but hydrogen sulphide emissions decreased linearly ( p < 0.010) with decreasing dietary CP. There was a weak positive relationship between odour emission and ammonia (linear: R 2 = 0.25, p = 0.005) with odour emission reduced as ammonia emission reduced. Reducing dietary CP in finishing pig diets could reduce ammonia emissions, water usage and slurry and nutrient output from pig production.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Elizabeth E. Ball & Sam Smyth & Violet E. Beattie & Kelvin J. McCracken & Ursula McCormack & Ramon Muns & Fred J. Gordon & Raymond Bradford & L. Alanna Reid & Elizabeth Magowan, 2022. "The Environmental Impact of Lowering Dietary Crude Protein in Finishing Pig Diets—The Effect on Ammonia, Odour and Slurry Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12016-:d:922679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tallentire, C.W. & Mackenzie, S.G. & Kyriazakis, I., 2017. "Environmental impact trade-offs in diet formulation for broiler production systems in the UK and USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 145-156.
    2. Michael Oster & Henry Reyer & Elizabeth Ball & Dario Fornara & John McKillen & Kristina Ulrich Sørensen & Hanne Damgaard Poulsen & Kim Andersson & Daniel Ddiba & Arno Rosemarin & Linda Arata & Paolo S, 2018. "Bridging Gaps in the Agricultural Phosphorus Cycle from an Animal Husbandry Perspective—The Case of Pigs and Poultry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ottosen, Mathias & Mackenzie, Stephen G. & Filipe, Joao A.N. & Misiura, Maciek M. & Kyriazakis, Ilias, 2021. "Changes in the environmental impacts of pig production systems in Great Britain over the last 18 years," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Sustainable Mineral Resource Management—Insights into the Case of Phosphorus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    3. Volker Wilke & Julia Gickel & Christian Visscher, 2023. "Monitoring of Performance-Based Environmental Impacts of Substituting Soybean Meal with Rapeseed Meal in the Rye-Based Diet of Weaned Pigs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12016-:d:922679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.