IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10462-d895091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field

Author

Listed:
  • Fabiana Frota de Albuquerque Landi

    (CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Claudia Fabiani

    (CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
    Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Anna Laura Pisello

    (CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
    Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Alessandro Petrozzi

    (CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Daniele Milone

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria (D.I.), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze-Build 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Franco Cotana

    (CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
    Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

Abstract

To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO 2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO 2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO 2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabiana Frota de Albuquerque Landi & Claudia Fabiani & Anna Laura Pisello & Alessandro Petrozzi & Daniele Milone & Franco Cotana, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10462-:d:895091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Dominguez-Delgado & Helena Domínguez-Torres & Carlos-Antonio Domínguez-Torres, 2020. "Energy and Economic Life Cycle Assessment of Cool Roofs Applied to the Refurbishment of Social Housing in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Chen, Kuan-Ju & Chi, Ting & Marsh, Thomas L., 2019. "Application of Biodegradable Mulches in Crop Production: A Life Cycle Assessment," 2019 Annual Meeting, July 21-23, Atlanta, Georgia 291188, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biao Li & Tao Wang & Chunxiao Li & Zhen Dong & Hua Yang & Yi Sun & Pengfei Wang, 2022. "A Strategy for Determining the Decommissioning Life of Energy Equipment Based on Economic Factors and Operational Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Wen Cao & Lin Yang & Qinyi Zhang & Lihua Chen & Weidong Wu, 2021. "Evaluation of Rural Dwellings’ Energy-Saving Retrofit with Adaptive Thermal Comfort Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Isadora Luiza Climaco Cunha & Fábio Rosa & Luiz Kulay, 2021. "Green Coalescent Synthesis Based on the Design for Environment (DfE) Principles: Brazilian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Alfonso Marino & Paolo Pariso & Michele Picariello, 2023. "Energy use and End-use Technologies: Organizational and Energy Analysis in Italian Hospitals," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 36-45, May.
    5. Jung Ho Kim & Young Il Kim, 2021. "Optimal Combination of External Wall Insulation Thickness and Surface Solar Reflectivity of Non-Residential Buildings in the Korean Peninsula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Paula M. Esquivias, 2020. "Decarbonization and Circular Economy in the Sustainable Development and Renovation of Buildings and Neighbourhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-6, September.
    7. Pirvaram, Atousa & Talebzadeh, Nima & Leung, Siu Ning & O'Brien, Paul G., 2022. "Radiative cooling for buildings: A review of techno-enviro-economics and life-cycle assessment methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10462-:d:895091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.