IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8802-d865723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Open Government Data to Sustainable City Indicators: A Megacity Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Harmi Takiya

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
    President’s Office, Court of Auditors of the City of São Paulo, São Paulo 04027-000, Brazil)

  • Iara Negreiros

    (Department of Civil Construction Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • José Alberto Quintanilha

    (Institute of Energy and Environment, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-070, Brazil)

  • Alex Abiko

    (Department of Civil Construction Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Cintia Isabel de Campos

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Federal University of Goias, Rua Mucuri S/N—Setor Conde dos Arcos, Aparecida de Goiânia 74968-755, Brazil)

  • Marcelo Schneck de Paula Pessoa

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Fernando Tobal Berssaneti

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

The access to open government data has been a relevant topic for societies around the world, especially over the last ten years. This paper aims to analyze the indicators of the São Paulo City Observatory (ObservaSampa), confronting them with the ISO 3712x series (sustainable, smart, and resilient cities) standards, to assess if the former meet both open data principles and the ISO prescriptions. Bibliometric analysis, comparative analysis, cluster analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were the methods used in this research. From the comparative analysis, 18 indicators were identified as conforming and 41 as partially conforming. Thus, 20% of the ObservaSampa indicators adhere to the ISO standards. The PCA applied to the conforming indicators shows component 1 is related to socioeconomic dimensions, while component 2 refers to social policy, with both appraisals confirmed by cluster analysis. Measuring and presenting city data in compliance with indicator standards is relevant because they open the possibility of comparing different cities. However, there is still a lack of consensus on a common set of indicators to be accommodated within the current ISO standards system.

Suggested Citation

  • Harmi Takiya & Iara Negreiros & Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura & José Alberto Quintanilha & Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado & Alex Abiko & Cintia Isabel de Campos & Marcelo Schneck de Paula Pessoa & , 2022. "Application of Open Government Data to Sustainable City Indicators: A Megacity Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8802-:d:865723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur Lehner & Christoph Erlacher & Matthias Schlögl & Jacob Wegerer & Thomas Blaschke & Klaus Steinnocher, 2018. "Can ISO-Defined Urban Sustainability Indicators Be Derived from Remote Sensing: An Expert Weighting Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Maxat Kassen, 2019. "Open data and e-government – related or competing ecosystems: a paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 552-578, July.
    3. Matthew Berman & Robert W. Orttung, 2020. "Measuring Progress toward Urban Sustainability: Do Global Measures Work for Arctic Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Vaia Moustaka & Antonios Maitis & Athena Vakali & Leonidas G. Anthopoulos, 2021. "Urban Data Dynamics: A Systematic Benchmarking Framework to Integrate Crowdsourcing and Smart Cities’ Standardization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-43, July.
    5. Erna Ruijer & Françoise Détienne & Michael Baker & Jonathan Groff & Albert Meijer, 2020. "The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency," Post-Print hal-02546332, HAL.
    6. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    7. Sławomira Hajduk & Dorota Jelonek, 2021. "A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanja Seljan & Marina Viličić & Zvonimir Nevistić & Luka Dedić & Marina Grubišić & Iva Cibilić & Karlo Kević & Bastiaan van Loenen & Frederika Welle Donker & Charalampos Alexopoulos, 2022. "Open Data as a Condition for Smart Application Development: Assessing Access to Hospitals in Croatian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Nutthawut Ritmak & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Dimension of Health Sustainability Model after Pandemic Crisis Using Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Jairo Filho Sousa de Almeida & Giseli Quirino Batista & José Eduardo Storopoli & Aaron Liu & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2022. "Understanding Sustainable Energy in the Context of Smart Cities: A PRISMA Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-38, March.
    3. Olga Bogdanov & Veljko Jeremiæ & Sandra Jednak & Mladen Èudanov, 2019. "Scrutinizing the Smart City Index: a multivariate statistical approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 777-799.
    4. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    5. Becker, Jörg & Distel, Bettina & Grundmann, Matthias & Hupperich, Thomas & Kersting, Norbert & Löschel, Andreas & Parreira do Amaral, Marcelo & Scholta, Hendrik, 2021. "Challenges and potentials of digitalisation for small and mid-sized towns: Proposition of a transdisciplinary research agenda," ERCIS Working Papers 36, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    6. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    7. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    8. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    9. Michael Yit Lin Chew & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Kwok Wei Shah & Vishal Kumar & Ghassan Fahem Hussein, 2020. "Evaluating the Roadmap of 5G Technology Implementation for Smart Building and Facilities Management in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Yamilé Pérez Guilarte & Daniel Barreiro Quintáns, 2019. "Using Big Data to Measure Tourist Sustainability: Myth or Reality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Alavaiola Faumatu & Maha Hussein & Muhammad Laiq Ur Rahman Shahid & Nitin Muttil, 2020. "Smart City-Ranking of Major Australian Cities to Achieve a Smarter Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Shahid Nawaz Khan & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2022. "Smart Distribution Mechanisms—Part I: From the Perspectives of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-109, December.
    13. Yi-Ming Guo & Zhen-Ling Huang & Ji Guo & Hua Li & Xing-Rong Guo & Mpeoane Judith Nkeli, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, 2022. "The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development—A Case Study of Aarhus City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Jorge Expósito López & José Javier Romero-Díaz de la Guardia & María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Ramón Chacón-Cuberos & Eva María Olmedo-Moreno, 2019. "Enhancing Skills for Employment in the Workplace of the Future 2020 Using the Theory of Connectivity: Shared and Adaptive Personal Learning Environments in a Spanish Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Kisała Magdalena, 2021. "The Polish Experience in the Development of Smart Cities," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 48-64, September.
    18. Anthea van der Hoogen & Ifeoluwapo Fashoro & Andre P. Calitz & Lamla Luke, 2024. "A Digital Transformation Framework for Smart Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno & Jordi Pascual, 2021. "Place Branding for Smart Cities and Smart Tourism Destinations: Do They Communicate Their Smartness?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8802-:d:865723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.