IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4795-d542820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishment of a Sustainability Assessment System for Bridges

Author

Listed:
  • Tai-Yi Liu

    (New Asia Construction and Development Corporation, Taipei 10567, Taiwan)

  • Guan-Ting Liu

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

  • Po-Han Chen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

  • Nelson N. S. Chou

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Ping Ho

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

In this paper, with the motivation of “green” and “sustainability” for bridge projects, ten key indicators were selected to establish a reliable and applicable sustainability assessment system. It is also expecting the civil infrastructure to be developed more ecologically, environmentally, and friendly by applying the proposed assessment system. The data collection method in this research is questionnaire-based expert interviews. The questionnaire results were well analyzed and calculated for the key indicators’ weights by adopting the top two boxes theory (TTBT) and multiple attribute value theory (MAVT). Consequently, the sustainability assessment system for green civil infrastructure (SASGCI) was established to evaluate infrastructure projects’ sustainability achievements. In this study, the authors conclude the weights of ten key indicators for bridges as follows: risk mitigation and reliability: 15.3%, durability: 15.1%, landscape: 11.5%, ecology: 10.6%, benefit and function: 9.7%, environmental protection and carbon emissions reduction: 9.5%, waste reduction: 8.5%, energy-saving: 7.1%, creativity: 7.0%, and humanities and culture reservation: 5.6%. An example of a scenic bridge in Taiwan is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the established SASGCI for sustainability evaluation. The result indicates that the evaluation system is successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Tai-Yi Liu & Guan-Ting Liu & Po-Han Chen & Nelson N. S. Chou & Shih-Ping Ho, 2021. "Establishment of a Sustainability Assessment System for Bridges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4795-:d:542820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tai-Yi Liu & Po-Han Chen & Nelson N. S. Chou, 2019. "Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao-Juan Li & Chen Wang & Wei-bin Chen & Shilpi Bora & Jeffrey Boon Hui Yap & Bimenyimana Samuel, 2022. "Green building performance assessment in China using a cloud model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11626-11650, October.
    2. Chisomo Kapatsa & Neema Kavishe & Godwin Maro & Sam Zulu, 2023. "The Identification of Sustainability Assessment Indicators for Road Infrastructure Projects in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Ana Ferreira & Manuel Pinheiro & Jorge de Brito & Ricardo Mateus, 2022. "Assessing the Sustainability of Retail Buildings: The Portuguese Method LiderA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Shengda Song & Jialing Che & Xiaohan Yuan, 2022. "Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Index Assessment of Green Buildings Based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Yi-Shin Lin & Jui-Sheng Chou & Chi-Hung Chiou, 2021. "Reengineered Governance Process for Assessing Core Public Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    6. María Isabel Más-López & Eva M. García-del-Toro & Daniel Alcala-Gonzalez & Sara García-Salgado, 2023. "Sustainability Assessment in Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo & James J. H. Liou, 2020. "A Combination of DEMATEL and BWM-Based ANP Methods for Exploring the Green Building Rating System in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Miseong Kim & Hyunji Moon & Minsu Chu & Yooshik Yoon, 2020. "A Study on the Complementary Direction of Guidelines for Developing Green Conventions in Korea: Using Comparative Analysis among Domestic and Overseas Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4795-:d:542820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.