IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4099-d531458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TOPOI RESOURCES: Quantification and Assessment of Global Warming Potential and Land-Uptake of Residential Buildings in Settlement Types along the Urban–Rural Gradient—Opportunities for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Ann-Kristin Mühlbach

    (TU Braunschweig, Institute for Building Services and Energy Design (IGS), Mühlenpfordtstr. 23, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Olaf Mumm

    (TU Braunschweig, Institute for Sustainable Urbanism (ISU), Pockelsstr. 3, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Ryan Zeringue

    (TU Braunschweig, Institute for Sustainable Urbanism (ISU), Pockelsstr. 3, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Oskars Redbergs

    (TU Braunschweig, Institute for Sustainable Urbanism (ISU), Pockelsstr. 3, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Elisabeth Endres

    (TU Braunschweig, Institute for Building Services and Energy Design (IGS), Mühlenpfordtstr. 23, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Vanessa Miriam Carlow

    (TU Braunschweig, Institute for Sustainable Urbanism (ISU), Pockelsstr. 3, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

Abstract

The METAPOLIS as the polycentric network of urban–rural settlement is undergoing constant transformation and urbanization processes. In particular, the associated imbalance of the shrinkage and growth of different settlement types in relative geographical proximity causes negative effects, such as urban sprawl and the divergence of urban–rural lifestyles with their related resource, land and energy consumption. Implicitly related to these developments, national and global sustainable development goals for the building sector lead to the question of how a region can be assessed without detailed research and surveys to identify critical areas with high potential for sustainable development. In this study, the TOPOI method is used. It classifies settlement units and their interconnections along the urban–rural gradient, in order to quantify and assess the land-uptake and global warming potential driven by residential developments. Applying standard planning parameters in combination with key data from a comprehensive life cycle assessment of the residential building stock, a detailed understanding of different settlement types and their associated resource and energy consumption is achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann-Kristin Mühlbach & Olaf Mumm & Ryan Zeringue & Oskars Redbergs & Elisabeth Endres & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2021. "TOPOI RESOURCES: Quantification and Assessment of Global Warming Potential and Land-Uptake of Residential Buildings in Settlement Types along the Urban–Rural Gradient—Opportunities for Sustainable Dev," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4099-:d:531458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian McGrath & S. T. A. Pickett, 2011. "The Metacity: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Ecology and Urban Design," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bin Liu & Chan Lu & Chun Yi, 2023. "Research on Green and Low-Carbon Rural Development in China: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace (1979–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa R. McHale & Steward T.A. Pickett & Olga Barbosa & David N. Bunn & Mary L. Cadenasso & Daniel L. Childers & Meredith Gartin & George R. Hess & David M. Iwaniec & Timon McPhearson & M. Nils Pete, 2015. "The New Global Urban Realm: Complex, Connected, Diffuse, and Diverse Social-Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Vanessa Carlow & Olaf Mumm & Dirk Neumann & Anne-Kathrin Schneider & Boris Schröder & Maycon Sedrez & Ryan Zeringue, 2022. "TOPOI – A method for analysing settlement units and their linkages in an urban–rural fabric," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1663-1681, July.
    3. Brian McGrath & Somporn Sangawongse & Danai Thaikatoo & Martina Barcelloni Corte, 2017. "The Architecture of the Metacity: Land Use Change, Patch Dynamics and Urban Form in Chiang Mai, Thailand," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 53-71.
    4. José G. Vargas-Hernández & Justyna Zdunek-Wielgołaska, 2021. "Urban green infrastructure as a tool for controlling the resilience of urban sprawl," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1335-1354, February.
    5. Zahra Mokhtari & Shahindokht Barghjelveh & Romina Sayahnia & Salman Qureshi & Alessio Russo, 2022. "Dynamic and Heterogeneity of Urban Heat Island: A Theoretical Framework in the Context of Urban Ecology," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Chiara Catalano & Mihaela Meslec & Jules Boileau & Riccardo Guarino & Isabella Aurich & Nathalie Baumann & Frédéric Chartier & Pascale Dalix & Sophie Deramond & Patrick Laube & Angela Ka Ki Lee & Pasc, 2021. "Smart Sustainable Cities of the New Millennium: Towards Design for Nature," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Talal Obaid Alshammari & Abbas M. Hassan & Yasser Arab & Heba Hussein & Fatemeh Khozaei & Maryam Saeed & Basma Ahmed & Manaf Zghaibeh & Wesam Beitelmal & Hyowon Lee, 2022. "The Compactness of Non-Compacted Urban Developments: A Critical Review on Sustainable Approaches to Automobility and Urban Sprawl," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4099-:d:531458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.