IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v2y2017i1p53-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Architecture of the Metacity: Land Use Change, Patch Dynamics and Urban Form in Chiang Mai, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Brian McGrath

    (Parsons School of Design, The New School, USA)

  • Somporn Sangawongse

    (Department of Geography, Chiang Mai University, Thailand)

  • Danai Thaikatoo

    (Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand)

  • Martina Barcelloni Corte

    (Laboratory of Urbanism, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

This essay analyzes the spatial and temporal dynamics which have emerged from the rapid development of Chiang Mai, Thailand over the last four decades. Modern urbanization since the 1980s in the previously remote Chiang Mai-Lamphun Valley has coincided with digital and financial globalization, neo-liberal governance, and the articulation of a new geological era of the Anthropocene based on evidence of human induced climate change. This time frame serves as a lens to theorize the architecture of the “metacity”, a new urban form and new form of urban practice responding to the demands of global digital financial networks and neo-liberal trade policies, but grounded in the ecology and life worlds of particular localities. The metacity appears in Chiang Mai within the interstices of a particularly fragmented rural/urban mix within a self-organized rather than plan-controlled built environment. The entire valley has been the site of intensive inhabitation for centuries, and recently urbanized, yet is spatially heterogeneous, extensive and patchy rather than ordered, bounded and uniform. The resulting landscape is marked by a disjunction between a feudal wet-rice cultivation land tenure structure overlaid with a market-based typology of urban real estate products with little enforcement of land use controls. The essay begins with theorizing the form of the metacity, continues with a description of the Chiang Mai case study, and concludes with a general assessment of the need to create a new form of metacity urban practice. A metacity design practice would re-conceptualize urban theories and forms by inking architectural and ecological thinking with inclusive social practices, enhanced by new digitally-enhanced urban imaginaries and new representational tools of mapping, modeling and design.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian McGrath & Somporn Sangawongse & Danai Thaikatoo & Martina Barcelloni Corte, 2017. "The Architecture of the Metacity: Land Use Change, Patch Dynamics and Urban Form in Chiang Mai, Thailand," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 53-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:53-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/869
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian McGrath & S. T. A. Pickett, 2011. "The Metacity: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Ecology and Urban Design," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa R. McHale & Steward T.A. Pickett & Olga Barbosa & David N. Bunn & Mary L. Cadenasso & Daniel L. Childers & Meredith Gartin & George R. Hess & David M. Iwaniec & Timon McPhearson & M. Nils Pete, 2015. "The New Global Urban Realm: Complex, Connected, Diffuse, and Diverse Social-Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Vanessa Carlow & Olaf Mumm & Dirk Neumann & Anne-Kathrin Schneider & Boris Schröder & Maycon Sedrez & Ryan Zeringue, 2022. "TOPOI – A method for analysing settlement units and their linkages in an urban–rural fabric," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1663-1681, July.
    3. Ann-Kristin Mühlbach & Olaf Mumm & Ryan Zeringue & Oskars Redbergs & Elisabeth Endres & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2021. "TOPOI RESOURCES: Quantification and Assessment of Global Warming Potential and Land-Uptake of Residential Buildings in Settlement Types along the Urban–Rural Gradient—Opportunities for Sustainable Dev," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-33, April.
    4. José G. Vargas-Hernández & Justyna Zdunek-Wielgołaska, 2021. "Urban green infrastructure as a tool for controlling the resilience of urban sprawl," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1335-1354, February.
    5. Zahra Mokhtari & Shahindokht Barghjelveh & Romina Sayahnia & Salman Qureshi & Alessio Russo, 2022. "Dynamic and Heterogeneity of Urban Heat Island: A Theoretical Framework in the Context of Urban Ecology," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Chiara Catalano & Mihaela Meslec & Jules Boileau & Riccardo Guarino & Isabella Aurich & Nathalie Baumann & Frédéric Chartier & Pascale Dalix & Sophie Deramond & Patrick Laube & Angela Ka Ki Lee & Pasc, 2021. "Smart Sustainable Cities of the New Millennium: Towards Design for Nature," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Talal Obaid Alshammari & Abbas M. Hassan & Yasser Arab & Heba Hussein & Fatemeh Khozaei & Maryam Saeed & Basma Ahmed & Manaf Zghaibeh & Wesam Beitelmal & Hyowon Lee, 2022. "The Compactness of Non-Compacted Urban Developments: A Critical Review on Sustainable Approaches to Automobility and Urban Sprawl," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:53-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.