IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p14031-d706290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thinking Deep. Acting on Top. Underground Built Heritage and Its Fringe as a Community Catalyst for Local Sustainable Development: Exploratory Cases from Poland and Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Maksymiuk

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 159 Nowoursynowska Street, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Montserrat Pallares-Barbera

    (Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Paschalis Arvanitidis

    (Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece)

  • Beata J. Gawryszewska

    (Department of Landscape Art, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 166 Nowoursynowska, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Underground Built Heritage (UBH) is a distinct class of cultural heritage providing a focal point for community pride and engagement to become a springboard for local sustainable development (LSD). This research aims to articulate how local UBH and its fringe serve as a facilitator of communal identity to mobilize community care towards social and economic development with less involvement from the state and the market actors. For this purpose, local (and less-conspicuous) cases of UBH are employed in Warsaw, Poland, and Volos, Greece, indicating the power of UBH to connect and engage local communities with places, triggering a momentum for a truly bottom-up action that pays less attention to market considerations and state support. The studied UBH sites have been discussed according to an established common framework, dealing with five main issues: (a) general context and status, (b) history, (c) users and management, (d) ecosystem services, and (e) introduction of the paradigm of living labs. The analysis was based on a thorough literature review and complemented by field observations and interviews. The results provide evidence for UBH as a potential facilitator of social and economic development. The case studies in Poland and Greece showed that local actors were involved in activities and social networks of tacit knowledge, generating community building to reinforce bottom-up activities in contact with UBH.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Maksymiuk & Montserrat Pallares-Barbera & Paschalis Arvanitidis & Beata J. Gawryszewska, 2021. "Thinking Deep. Acting on Top. Underground Built Heritage and Its Fringe as a Community Catalyst for Local Sustainable Development: Exploratory Cases from Poland and Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:14031-:d:706290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/14031/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/14031/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence W.C. Lai & Stephen N.G. Davies & Frank T. Lorne, 2019. "Trialogue on Built Heritage and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivian Welch & Christine M. Mathew & Panteha Babelmorad & Yanfei Li & Elizabeth T. Ghogomu & Johan Borg & Monserrat Conde & Elizabeth Kristjansson & Anne Lyddiatt & Sue Marcus & Jason W. Nickerson & K, 2021. "Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    2. Natalia P Montoya & Lia C O B Glaz & César C C Abad & Lucas A Pereira & Irineu Loturco, 2020. "What teachers need to know and be able to do: A view from teachers, students, and principals in the Brazilian context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Raza, Muhammad Yousaf & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Future outlook and influencing factors analysis of natural gas consumption in Bangladesh: An economic and policy perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Shu-Yen Wang & Shyh-Huei Hwang, 2019. "Research on Field Reconstruction and Community Design of Living Settlements—An Example of Repairing a Fish Stove in the Hua-Zhai Settlement on Wang-An Island, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-30, October.
    5. KW Chau & Lawrence WC Lai & Mark H Chua, 2022. "Post-colonial conservation of colonial built heritage in Hong Kong: A statistical analysis of historic building grading," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 671-686, February.
    6. Zaiton Hassan & Norhayati Hussin & Hasnah Hashim & Nurul Syfa Mohd Tokiran, 2020. "Information Seeking in Knowledge Society: Choose Right from Wrong," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 151-158, March.
    7. Surana, Kavita & Singh, Anuraag & Sagar, Ambuj D, 2020. "Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Lawrence W.C. Lai, 2020. "Sustainable development of heritage conservation and tourism: A Hong Kong case study on colonial heritage," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1181-1188, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:14031-:d:706290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.