IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12509-d677725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effective Inspection of Rebar Spacing and Clearance Using RGB-D Sensors

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxing Yuan

    (Center for Advanced Research and Computing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Fernando Moreu

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Maryam Hojati

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

Abstract

The quality assurance of constructing reinforced concrete (RC) structures in compliance with their design plays a key role in the durability, serviceability, and sustainability of the built RC elements. One area of concern in the quality control of constructing RC structures is examining the position and dimension of the rebars before pouring fresh concrete. Currently, this is accomplished by visual inspection and individually by hand with limited time available between construction stages. Over the past decades, structural health and monitoring during the construction period has applied remote sensing technologies. However, little research has focused on the use of such technologies to inspect and evaluate rebar placement prior to concrete pouring as quality control. In this study we develop an algorithm that facilitates inspecting the positions of rebars and the cover of concrete using a new-generation low-cost RGB-D sensor to find incorrect rebar placement. The proposed method is evaluated using a typical 5 × 5 two-layer rebar cage in the laboratory by comparing the proposed technique with traditional inspection methods. The results show that the RGB-D sensor can achieve cost-effective inspection for rebar spacing and clearance with an acceptable tolerance. The evaluation of rebar spacing results shows that the maximum standard deviation for rebar spacing is 0.34 inch (8.64 mm) between longitudinal rebar 2 and 3, which is the same as the rebar construction and traditional tape measurement results. The concrete cover estimation results show that the maximum standard deviation for rebar cage concrete cover is 0.19 inch (4.83 mm) for longitudinal rebar 3. The issues of new RGB-D sensor scan settings and the test results will be helpful for practitioners in improving construction quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxing Yuan & Fernando Moreu & Maryam Hojati, 2021. "Cost-Effective Inspection of Rebar Spacing and Clearance Using RGB-D Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12509-:d:677725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianpaolo Di Bona & Antonio Forcina & Domenico Falcone & Luca Silvestri, 2020. "Critical Risks Method (CRM): A New Safety Allocation Approach for a Critical Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Hyung-Min Lee & Han-Seung Lee & Sang-ho Min & Seungmin Lim & Jitendra Kumar Singh, 2018. "Carbonation-Induced Corrosion Initiation Probability of Rebars in Concrete With/Without Finishing Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Keehoon Kwon & Doyeong Kim & Sunkuk Kim, 2021. "Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shihab Uddin & Qing Lu & Hung Nguyen, 2021. "Truck Impact on Buried Water Pipes in Interdependent Water and Road Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Ievgen Babeshko & Oleg Illiashenko & Vyacheslav Kharchenko & Kostiantyn Leontiev, 2022. "Towards Trustworthy Safety Assessment by Providing Expert and Tool-Based XMECA Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Sunkuk Kim, 2021. "Technology and Management for Sustainable Buildings and Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-3, August.
    4. Ben J. M. Ale & Des N. D. Hartford & David H. Slater, 2021. "Living with Legacy Risk—The Limits of Practicalities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Dan Su & Yi-Sheng Liu & Xin-Tong Li & Xiao-Yan Chen & Dong-Han Li, 2020. "Management Path of Concrete Beam Bridge in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Fabio De Felice & Ilaria Baffo & Antonella Petrillo, 2022. "Critical Infrastructures Overview: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Moonsun Park & Nahyun Kwon & Joosung Lee & Sanghyo Lee & Yonghan Ahn, 2019. "Probabilistic Maintenance Cost Analysis for Aged Multi-Family Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Chenxing Cui & Li Song & Jinliang Liu & Zhiwu Yu, 2021. "Corrosion-Fatigue Life Prediction Modeling for RC Structures under Coupled Carbonation and Repeated Loading," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Emilia Kuliczkowska, 2020. "An Approach to Analysing Water Consumers’ Acceptance of Risk-Reduction Costs," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Suchismita Satapathy, 2022. "Work place discomfort and risk factors for construction site workers," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 668-680, April.
    11. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2023. "The ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management Standard: How to Extract Value from Data in the IT Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Saeideh Sheikhpour & Amin Kargar-Barzi & Ali Mahani, 2022. "A novel component mixing and mixed redundancy strategy for reliability optimization," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 328-346, February.
    13. Chao Jiang & Jing Fang, 2020. "Time-Dependent Reliability-Based Service Life Assessment of RC Bridges Subjected to Carbonation under a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    14. H. Metatla & M. Rouainia, 2022. "Functional and dysfunctional analysis of a safety instrumented system (SIS) through the common cause failures (CCFs) assessment. Case of high integrity protection pressure system (HIPPS)," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1932-1954, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12509-:d:677725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.