IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1187-d317513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-Dependent Reliability-Based Service Life Assessment of RC Bridges Subjected to Carbonation under a Changing Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Jiang

    (Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China
    Department of Structural Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jing Fang

    (Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China
    Department of Structural Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

This paper assessed the service life of RC bridges subjected to carbonation under a changing climate based on time-dependent reliability analysis. First, a simplified carbonation model and the corresponding incremental method were briefly reviewed. Then, the fatigue damage prediction model and climate model were briefly introduced. Afterward, the Monte Carlo simulation-based time-dependent reliability analysis procedure for service life assessments was presented, which integrated the carbonation depth prediction model, fatigue damage prediction model and climate model. Based on the analysis procedure, a comprehensive case study was conducted to estimate the effects of climate change, fatigue damage, concrete cover thickness and concrete grade on the service life under different reliability levels. The case study showed that the service life under a reliability level of 2 is around half of that under the reliability level of 1. Under the reliability level of 1.5, the service life under RCP8.5 (a high emission scenario defined by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) can be 28 years shorter than that under no climate changes. The service life at girder top undergoing compressive fatigue damage can be 49% shorter than that without fatigue damage and 25 years shorter than that at girder bottom undergoing tensile fatigue damage. The service life at girder top with a concrete cover thickness of 45 mm can reach 2.6 times that with a concrete cover thickness of 25 mm. The service life of C50 concrete can reach approximately 2–3 times that of C30 concrete. These findings inform civil engineers that for existing RC bridges, the effects of climate change and fatigue damage should be properly considered when the remaining service life of RC bridges is concerned. Moreover, for planned RC bridges, higher concrete grade and thicker concrete cover are two effective choices to achieve a longer service life.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Jiang & Jing Fang, 2020. "Time-Dependent Reliability-Based Service Life Assessment of RC Bridges Subjected to Carbonation under a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1187-:d:317513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Val, Dimitri V. & Trapper, Pavel A., 2008. "Probabilistic evaluation of initiation time of chloride-induced corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 364-372.
    2. Ki-Bong Park & Xiao-Yong Wang, 2017. "Effect of Climate Change on Service Life of High Volume Fly Ash Concrete Subjected to Carbonation—A Korean Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Hyung-Min Lee & Han-Seung Lee & Sang-ho Min & Seungmin Lim & Jitendra Kumar Singh, 2018. "Carbonation-Induced Corrosion Initiation Probability of Rebars in Concrete With/Without Finishing Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vishwanath, B Sharanbaswa & Banerjee, Swagata, 2023. "Considering uncertainty in corrosion process to estimate life-cycle seismic vulnerability and risk of aging bridge piers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Hyung-Min Lee & Han-Seung Lee & Sang-ho Min & Seungmin Lim & Jitendra Kumar Singh, 2018. "Carbonation-Induced Corrosion Initiation Probability of Rebars in Concrete With/Without Finishing Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Bigaud, David & Ali, Osama, 2014. "Time-variant flexural reliability of RC beams with externally bonded CFRP under combined fatigue-corrosion actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 257-270.
    4. Moonsun Park & Nahyun Kwon & Joosung Lee & Sanghyo Lee & Yonghan Ahn, 2019. "Probabilistic Maintenance Cost Analysis for Aged Multi-Family Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Chenxing Cui & Li Song & Jinliang Liu & Zhiwu Yu, 2021. "Corrosion-Fatigue Life Prediction Modeling for RC Structures under Coupled Carbonation and Repeated Loading," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Xinxing Yuan & Fernando Moreu & Maryam Hojati, 2021. "Cost-Effective Inspection of Rebar Spacing and Clearance Using RGB-D Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Xingji Zhu & Zaixian Chen & Hao Wang & Yabin Chen & Longjun Xu, 2018. "Probabilistic Generalization of a Comprehensive Model for the Deterioration Prediction of RC Structure under Extreme Corrosion Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Xiao-Jian Gao & Xiao-Yong Wang, 2017. "Impacts of Global Warming and Sea Level Rise on Service Life of Chloride-Exposed Concrete Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1187-:d:317513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.