IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12090-d670520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Management in the Biotech Context: Exploring the Interrelation between Maturity and Sustainable Project Management

Author

Listed:
  • José Magano

    (Research Center in Business and Economics (CICEE), Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Rua Sta, Marta 47, 5 Andar, 1150-293 Lisboa, Portugal
    Institute of Business and Tourism Sciences, Rua de Cedofeita, 285, 4050-180 Porto, Portugal)

  • Cláudia Sousa Silva

    (GOVCOPP, Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering Industrial and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Micaela Martins

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering Industrial and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Biotechnology is an emerging and increasingly important sector in the current context. As the number of biotech projects grows, so does the need to establish processes to improve project management effectiveness and project success, including assessing their impacts (positive and negative) on the Sustainable Development Goal (SDGs). This broader approach opens the door to developing a new project management (PM) paradigm designated by sustainable project management (SPM). However, there is a need for more empirical studies to understand how sustainability can be integrated into project management. This research is based on the proposition that PM maturity could lead to incorporating sustainability in PM. No research studies are reported in the literature exploring this interrelationship between maturity and sustainable project management; such is this study’s purpose and originality. The study applies Kerzner’s Level 3 PM maturity model on a sample of 96 biotech companies in Portugal through a questionnaire that addressed project managers and team members. The findings suggest that the process of integrating sustainability into PM should follow these steps: (1) perform an early PM maturity diagnosis to identify the company’s most and least dominated areas; (2) identify the strengths and weaknesses that impact the integration of sustainability into project management practices; (3) develop a customized and adjusted action plan to integrate sustainability in PM. The study’s main contribution relies on understanding how sustainability can be integrated into project management, explaining the role of maturity assessment in this process. In addition, it characterizes the biotech industry projects concerning the linkage between PM maturity and sustainability and provides recommendations that may contribute to the companies’ development towards sustainable project management.

Suggested Citation

  • José Magano & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Micaela Martins, 2021. "Project Management in the Biotech Context: Exploring the Interrelation between Maturity and Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12090-:d:670520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12090/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12090/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Ângela Leite, 2021. "Exploring Characteristics of Sustainability Stimulus Patterns of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Bersam Bolat & Aslı Kuşdemir & İpek Ceren Uslu & Gül Tekin Temur, 2017. "An Assessment for IT Project Maturity Levels," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Cláudia Silva & José Magano & Anna Moskalenko & Teresa Nogueira & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Hélder Fernando Pedrosa e Sousa, 2020. "Sustainable Management Systems Standards (SMSS): Structures, Roles, and Practices in Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Ophelie Dubois & Gilbert Silvius, 2020. "The Relation Between Sustainable Project Management and Project Success," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(4), pages 218-238.
    5. Carl Marnewick & Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Exploring Patterns of Sustainability Stimuli of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Sven Wydra, 2019. "Value Chains for Industrial Biotechnology in the Bioeconomy-Innovation System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Luis Emilio Alvarez-Dionisi & Rodney Turner & Mitali Mittra, 2016. "Global Project Management Trends," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 54-73, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raquel Castro Madureira & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Marlene Amorim & Marta Ferreira Dias & Bruno Lins & Gisela Mello, 2022. "Think Twice to Achieve a Sustainable Project Management: From Ecological Sustainability towards the Sustainable Project Management Cube Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Ângela Leite, 2021. "Exploring Characteristics of Sustainability Stimulus Patterns of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Ruben van der Sluijs & Gilbert Silvius, 2023. "Exploring the Values of a Sustainable Project Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Raquel Castro Madureira & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Marlene Amorim & Marta Ferreira Dias & Bruno Lins & Gisela Mello, 2022. "Think Twice to Achieve a Sustainable Project Management: From Ecological Sustainability towards the Sustainable Project Management Cube Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Gilbert Silvius & Ronald Ursem & José Magano, 2023. "Exploring the Project Owner’s Behaviour of Addressing Sustainability in Project Assignment and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Muhammad Abdul Karim & Tze San Ong & Sin Huei Ng & Haslinah Muhammad & Noor Azman Ali, 2022. "Organizational Aspects and Practices for Enhancing Organizational Project Management Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Cláudia Sousa Silva & José Magano & Ana Matos & Teresa Nogueira, 2021. "Sustainable Quality Management Systems in the Current Paradigm: The Role of Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Agata Klaus-Rosińska & Joanna Iwko, 2021. "Stakeholder Management—One of the Clues of Sustainable Project Management—As an Underestimated Factor of Project Success in Small Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Alexandra Gottinger & Luana Ladu & Rainer Quitzow, 2020. "Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Evgeny N. Starikov & Marina V. Evseeva & Ilya V. Naumov, 2022. "Managing industrial growth: The role of development funds," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 16-29, July.
    11. Candy Poon & Gilbert Silvius, 2020. "Factors That Stimulate Project Managers to Consider Sustainability; Exploring the Stimulus Patterns of Canadian Project Managers," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-90, March.
    12. Grażyna Bartkowiak & Agnieszka Krugiełka & Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk & Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek-Bracha, 2022. "Experiencing Stress among Different Professional Groups in the Context of Their Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Alberto Bezama & Carlo Ingrao & Sinéad O’Keeffe & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Grażyna Bartkowiak & Agnieszka Krugiełka & Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk & Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek, 2021. "Styles of Coping with Stress as a Factor Influencing Professional Burnout among Professional Officers of the Polish Army in the Context of Their Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Gilbert Silvius, 2019. "Making Sense of Sustainable Project Management," Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 106-109, January.
    16. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Teresa Nogueira & Farzad Hamed, 2024. "Consideration of Sustainability in Projects: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari & Faris Elghaish & Ahmad M. A. Zamil & Mohammad Alhusban & Thikryat Jibril Obied Qaralleh, 2023. "Benefits of Implementing Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems for the Sustainable Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-35, August.
    18. Nuria Magdalena Maier & Philip Emmerich, 2022. "Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the DACH Region," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 67-83.
    19. Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Planning Project Stakeholder Engagement from a Sustainable Development Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Wilde, Kerstin & Hermans, Frans, 2021. "Innovation in the bioeconomy: Perspectives of entrepreneurs on relevant framework conditions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 314.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12090-:d:670520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.