IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1269-d1332010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consideration of Sustainability in Projects: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • José Magano

    (Research Center in Business and Economics (CICEE), Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Rua Sta. Marta 47, 5.º Andar, 1150-293 Lisboa, Portugal
    Higher Institute of Business Sciences and Tourism (ISCET), 4050-180 Porto, Portugal)

  • Gilbert Silvius

    (Research Centre, Apeldoorn Campus, Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences, Brinklaan 268, 7311 JD Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
    Institute for People & Business, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Padualaan, 101, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Applied Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Bunting Road Campus, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Teresa Nogueira

    (School of Engineering, Polytechnic Institute of Porto (P. Porto), 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology (CIETI), P. Porto, R. Dr. António Benardino de Almeida, 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal)

  • Farzad Hamed

    (Research Centre, Apeldoorn Campus, Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences, Brinklaan 268, 7311 JD Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The consideration of sustainability in projects is one of the most critical global trends in project management today, as projects are instrumental in the sustainable development of organisations and society. In the growing literature on this topic, most studies take a qualitative approach, often based on single case studies, and quantitative studies are underrepresented. To address these limitations, this study aims to examine the extent to which different aspects and perspectives of sustainability are integrated into projects by reporting a quantitative analysis of the consideration of sustainability in 134 projects. The analysis used the Sustainable Project Management Maturity Model SPM3 to analyse the level at which sustainability was considered in the projects. The results show that, on average, sustainability is considered at a reactive level, with the desired levels of consideration on average one level higher (proactive). When considering the different triple bottom line perspectives, the economic perspective scores highest, followed by the social and environmental perspectives. The study also shows that building-related projects score higher on sustainability considerations than other project types, as do larger projects. Limitations of the study include its European focus, the relatively small sample size, and the fact that the data was collected in different locations over a four-year period, which raises the possibility of subjective differences in the evaluation of individual projects. Nevertheless, the study can be seen as a ‘wake-up call’ for project practitioners, who need to be more proactive in this regard if projects are to be the route to sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Teresa Nogueira & Farzad Hamed, 2024. "Consideration of Sustainability in Projects: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1269-:d:1332010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Ângela Leite, 2021. "Exploring Characteristics of Sustainability Stimulus Patterns of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruben van der Sluijs & Gilbert Silvius, 2023. "Exploring the Values of a Sustainable Project Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. José Magano & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Micaela Martins, 2021. "Project Management in the Biotech Context: Exploring the Interrelation between Maturity and Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Raquel Castro Madureira & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Marlene Amorim & Marta Ferreira Dias & Bruno Lins & Gisela Mello, 2022. "Think Twice to Achieve a Sustainable Project Management: From Ecological Sustainability towards the Sustainable Project Management Cube Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Gilbert Silvius & Ronald Ursem & José Magano, 2023. "Exploring the Project Owner’s Behaviour of Addressing Sustainability in Project Assignment and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1269-:d:1332010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.