IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11355-d656256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method to Estimate Surface Soil Moisture and Map the Irrigated Cropland Area Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data

Author

Listed:
  • Saman Rabiei

    (Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-8639, Iran)

  • Ehsan Jalilvand

    (Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-8639, Iran)

  • Massoud Tajrishy

    (Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-8639, Iran)

Abstract

Considering variations in surface soil moisture (SSM) is essential in improving crop yield and irrigation scheduling. Today, most remotely sensed soil moisture products have difficulties in resolving irrigation signals at the plot scale. This study aims to use Sentinel-1 radar backscatter and Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery to estimate SSM at high spatial (10 m) and temporal resolution (at least 5 days) over an agricultural domain. Three supervised machine learning algorithms, multilayer perceptron (MLP), a convolutional neural network (CNN), and linear regression models, were trained to estimate changes in SSM based on the variation in surface reflectance and backscatter over five different crops. Results showed that CNN is the best algorithm as it understands spatial relations and better represents two-dimensional images. Estimated values for SSM were in agreement with in-situ measurements regardless of the crop type, with R M S E = 0.0292 ( cm 3 / cm 3 ) and R 2 = 0.92 for the Sentinel-2 derived SSM and R M S E = 0.0317 ( cm 3 / cm 3 ) and R 2 = 0.84 for the Sentinel-1 soil moisture data. Moreover, a time series of estimated SSM based on Sentinel-1 (SSM-S1), Sentinel-2 (SSM-S2), and SSM derived from SMAP-Sentinel1 was compared. The developed SSM data showed a significantly higher mean SSM state over irrigated agriculture relative to the rainfed cropland area during the irrigation season. The multiple comparisons (fisher LSD) were tested and found that these two groups are different ( p v a l u e = 0.035 in 95% confidence interval). Therefore, by employing the maximum likelihood classification on the SSM data, we managed to map the irrigated agriculture. The overall accuracy of this unsupervised classification is 77%, with a kappa coefficient of 65%.

Suggested Citation

  • Saman Rabiei & Ehsan Jalilvand & Massoud Tajrishy, 2021. "A Method to Estimate Surface Soil Moisture and Map the Irrigated Cropland Area Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11355-:d:656256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Domínguez-Niño, Jesús María & Oliver-Manera, Jordi & Girona, Joan & Casadesús, Jaume, 2020. "Differential irrigation scheduling by an automated algorithm of water balance tuned by capacitance-type soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Prashant K. Srivastava, 2017. "Satellite Soil Moisture: Review of Theory and Applications in Water Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 3161-3176, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conesa, María R. & Conejero, Wenceslao & Vera, Juan & Agulló, Vicente & García-Viguera, Cristina & Ruiz-Sánchez, M. Carmen, 2021. "Irrigation management practices in nectarine fruit quality at harvest and after cold storage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Xueqin Jiang & Shanjun Luo & Qin Ye & Xican Li & Weihua Jiao, 2022. "Hyperspectral Estimates of Soil Moisture Content Incorporating Harmonic Indicators and Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. George Tsakiris, 2017. "Facets of Modern Water Resources Management: Prolegomena," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2899-2904, August.
    4. Li, Shengping & Tan, Deshui & Wu, Xueping & Degré, Aurore & Long, Huaiyu & Zhang, Shuxiang & Lu, Jinjing & Gao, Lili & Zheng, Fengjun & Liu, Xiaotong & Liang, Guopeng, 2021. "Negative pressure irrigation increases vegetable water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency by improving soil water and NO3–-N distributions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. George P. Petropoulos & Prashant K. Srivastava & Maria Piles & Simon Pearson, 2018. "Earth Observation-Based Operational Estimation of Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Crops in Support of Sustainable Water Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Zhang, Yong-Rong & Shang, Guo-Fei & Leng, Pei & Ma, Chunfeng & Ma, Jianwei & Zhang, Xia & Li, Zhao-Liang, 2023. "Estimation of quasi-full spatial coverage soil moisture with fine resolution in China from the combined use of ERA5-Land reanalysis and TRIMS land surface temperature product," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Martínez-Romero, A. & López-Urrea, R. & Montoya, F. & Pardo, J.J. & Domínguez, A., 2021. "Optimization of irrigation scheduling for barley crop, combining AquaCrop and MOPECO models to simulate various water-deficit regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    8. Pan, Ying & Zhu, Yonghua & Lü, Haishen & Yagci, Ali Levent & Fu, Xiaolei & Liu, En & Xu, Haiting & Ding, Zhenzhou & Liu, Ruoyu, 2023. "Accuracy of agricultural drought indices and analysis of agricultural drought characteristics in China between 2000 and 2019," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Zsuzsanna Ladányi & Károly Barta & Viktória Blanka & Benjámin Pálffy, 2021. "Assessing Available Water Content of Sandy Soils to Support Drought Monitoring and Agricultural Water Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 869-880, February.
    10. Puig-Sirera, Àngela & Provenzano, Giuseppe & González-Altozano, Pablo & Intrigliolo, Diego S. & Rallo, Giovanni, 2021. "Irrigation water saving strategies in Citrus orchards: Analysis of the combined effects of timing and severity of soil water deficit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Prashant K. Srivastava & Prem C. Pandey & George P. Petropoulos & Nektarios N. Kourgialas & Varsha Pandey & Ujjwal Singh, 2019. "GIS and Remote Sensing Aided Information for Soil Moisture Estimation: A Comparative Study of Interpolation Techniques," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Bwambale, Erion & Abagale, Felix K. & Anornu, Geophrey K., 2022. "Smart irrigation monitoring and control strategies for improving water use efficiency in precision agriculture: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Yiyuan Pang & Francesco Marinello & Pan Tang & Hong Li & Qi Liang, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Smart Irrigation for Smart Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11355-:d:656256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.