IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i1p398-d474579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corrosion Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Made with Fly Ash and Bottom Ash

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka Morla

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada)

  • Rishi Gupta

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada)

  • Peiman Azarsa

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada)

  • Ashutosh Sharma

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada)

Abstract

Environmental pollution caused by CO 2 releasing from the production of cement is a great challenge for the construction industry and has triggered exploration into more sustainable alternatives. Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) is a potential sustainable solution that does not involve the use of cement as a binder. GPC is produced by mixing the alumino-silicate source materials such as fly-ash with alkali activators such as potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium silicate (K 2 SiO 3 ). Unlike Ordinary Portland Concrete (OPC), the characteristics of GPC depend on the precursor materials and therefore vary for different mixes. Consequently, corrosion behavior needs to be evaluated separately for individual mixes. This has narrowed the scope of existing published work on corrosion behavior of GPC. In this study, GPC and OPC specimens were prepared and exposed to accelerated corrosion exposure. Half-cell potential and linear polarization resistance were used to evaluate the corrosion rate in GPC and OPC. Under accelerated conditions, the corrosion rate of the GPC specimens was between 10 µm/year and 20 µm/year exhibiting a moderate to high rate of corrosion. Meanwhile, the corrosion rate of the OPC specimens was between 40 µm/year and 60 µm/year indicating a very high corrosion activity. It can be concluded that GPC has a higher resistance to chloride-induced corrosion; with a low corrosion rate and lower mass loss percentage, compared to OPC.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka Morla & Rishi Gupta & Peiman Azarsa & Ashutosh Sharma, 2021. "Corrosion Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Made with Fly Ash and Bottom Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:398-:d:474579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holmgren, Sara & Pever, Maris & Fischer, Klara, 2019. "Constructing low-carbon futures? Competing storylines in the Estonian energy sector's translation of EU energy goals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goran Vizentin & Darko Glujić & Vedrana Špada, 2021. "Effect of Time-Real Marine Environment Exposure on the Mechanical Behavior of FRP Composites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Mohammad Mehdi Roshani & Seyed Hamidreza Kargar & Visar Farhangi & Moses Karakouzian, 2021. "Predicting the Effect of Fly Ash on Concrete’s Mechanical Properties by ANN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Hemn Unis Ahmed & Azad A. Mohammed & Serwan Rafiq & Ahmed S. Mohammed & Amir Mosavi & Nadhim Hamah Sor & Shaker M. A. Qaidi, 2021. "Compressive Strength of Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete Composites: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-38, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Peter Bindzár, 2020. "Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Alessandro Sciullo & Gregory Winston Gilcrease & Mario Perugini & Dario Padovan & Barbara Curli & Jay Sterling Gregg & Osman Arrobbio & Erika Meynaerts & Sarah Delvaux & Lucia Polo-Alvarez & Chiara Ca, 2022. "Exploring Institutional and Socio-Economic Settings for the Development of Energy Communities in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Chen, Bin & Li, Yanlin & Yuan, Mengxue & Shen, Jun & Wang, Sha & Tong, Jianhui & Guo, Yun, 2022. "Study of the Co-pyrolysis characteristics of oil shale with wheat straw based on the hierarchical collection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    4. Lelde Metla-Rozentāle & Vineta Kleinberga & Kristiāna Žaunerčika & Andris Sprūds, 2022. "Reflection of the EU Climate Policy Strategic Narrative in the Programmes of Latvian Political Parties—External Convergence and Influence on Shaping Public Opinion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Jarosław Brodny & Magdalena Tutak & Peter Bindzár, 2021. "Assessing the Level of Renewable Energy Development in the European Union Member States. A 10-Year Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-38, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:398-:d:474579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.