IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10641-d642765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Methods of Cross-Cultural Learning in an International Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Mirosław Jarosiński

    (Department of International Management, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Miklós Kozma

    (Department of Business Studies, Corvinus University of Budapest, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Jurgita Sekliuckiene

    (School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The paper addresses a gap in the literature concerning the difference between enhanced and not enhanced cross-cultural learning in an international classroom. The objective of the described research was to clarify if the environment of international classrooms could enhance cross-cultural competences significantly enough or if additional focus on cross-cultural learning as an explicit objective of learning activities would add substantially to the experience. The research question was defined as “how can a specific exercise focused on cross-cultural learning enhance the cross-cultural skills of university students in an international classroom?”. Surveys were conducted among international students in three leading Central-European Universities in Lithuania, Poland and Hungary to measure the increase of their cross-cultural competences. The Lithuanian and Polish classes were composed of international students and concentrated on International Management/Business topics (explicit method). The Hungarian survey was done in a general business class that just happened to be international in its composition (implicit method). Overall, our findings prove that the implicit method resulted in comparable, somewhat even stronger effectiveness than the explicit method. The study method included the analyses of students’ individual increases in each study dimension and construction of a compound measure to note the overall results. Our findings confirm the power of the international classroom as a stimulating environment for latent cross-cultural learning even without specific exercises focused on cross-cultural learning itself. However, the specific exercise did induce additional learning, especially related to cross-cultural awareness and communication with representatives of other cultures, even though the extent of that learning may be interpreted as underwhelming. The main conclusion from the study is that the diversity of the students engaged in a project provided an environment that supported cross-cultural learning, even without specific culture-focused reflections or exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirosław Jarosiński & Miklós Kozma & Jurgita Sekliuckiene, 2021. "Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Methods of Cross-Cultural Learning in an International Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10641-:d:642765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griffiths, Kathleen & Kopanidis, Foula & Steel, Marion, 2018. "Investigating the value of a peer-to-peer mentoring experience," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 92-98.
    2. Magdalena M. Stuss & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna & Zbigniew J. Makieła, 2019. "Competences of Graduates of Higher Education Business Studies in Labor Market I (Results of Pilot Cross-Border Research Project in Poland and Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. A. Bartel-Radic & J.C Moos & S. Long, 2015. "Cross-cultural management learning through innovative pedagogy: an exploratory study of globally distributed student teams," Post-Print halshs-01321719, HAL.
    4. Łukasz Wróblewski & Bogusław Dziadzia & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz, 2018. "Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services—Barriers and Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Piotr Bartkowiak, 2022. "Various Facets of Sustainable Smart City Management: Selected Examples from Polish Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Xiaoteng Ma & Ziyu Tang & Dan Wang & Hao Gao, 2020. "The Influence of Risk Culture on the Performance of International Joint-Venture Securities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. María-Angeles Rastrollo-Horrillo, 2020. "Strategic Decisions to Enhance the Internationalization of the Performing Arts and Their Sustainability: The Case of Flamenco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Zdzislawa Dacko-Pikiewicz & Jacek Wodz & Karolina Walancik-Ryba & Wojciech Pikiewicz, 2021. "Remote Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 112-126.
    5. Malgorzata Markowska & Danuta Strahl & Andrzej Sokolowski, 2021. "Dynamic Cluster Analysis of Educated and Smart Society Development in European Union Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 52-64.
    6. Paweł Poszytek & Monika Hyrcza-Michalska & Jarosław Brodny & Paweł Wawrzała & Przemysław Gębal & Joanna Lisok & Joanna Kruszewska & Aldis G. Sigurðardóttir & Michaela Bugnova & Małgorzata Dobrowolska, 2023. "Theoretical Review of Research to Date on Competences 4.0—What Do We Know about Competences in Industry 4.0? A Status Quo Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Honorata Howaniec & Marcin Lis, 2020. "Euroregions and Local and Regional Development—Local Perceptions of Cross-Border Cooperation and Euroregions Based on the Euroregion Beskydy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Zbigniew J. Makieła & Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Mariusz Raczek & Krzysztof Wrana & Janusz Michałek, 2022. "Tools for Network Smart City Management—The Case Study of Potential Possibility of Managing Energy and Associated Emissions in Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Lukasz Wroblewski & Marek Walancik, 2021. "The Relationship Between the Inhabitants of the City Divided by the Border with Polish and Czech Cultural Institutions in the Context of Cultural Education," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 127-142.
    10. Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh, 2021. "Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Sustainable Acceptance Model of the Expansion Technology Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Łukasz Wróblewski & Andrzej Kasperek, 2019. "Euroregion as an Entity Stimulating the Sustainable Development of the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services in a City Divided by a Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Jan Suchacek, 2022. "Solid as a Rock: Media Portrayals of Cross-Border Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Łukasz Wróblewski & Katarzyna Bilińska-Reformat & Mateusz Grzesiak, 2018. "Sustainable Activity of Cultural Service Consumers of Social Media Users—Influence on the Brand Capital of Cultural Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Aigul Sergeyeva & Akzhunus Abdullina & Mamatkodir Nazarov & Izimbet Turdimambetov & Muxammadismoil Maxmudov & Sergey Yanchuk, 2022. "Development of Cross-Border Tourism in Accordance with the Principles of Sustainable Development on the Kazakhstan-Uzbekistan Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Ireneusz Nowak & Katarzyna Szczepanska-Woszczyna & Arkadiusz Letkiewicz & Iwona Klonowska, 2021. "Air Force NCOs Competency Profile in the Future Operational Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 457-468.
    16. Magdalena M. Stuss & Zbigniew J. Makieła & Izabela Stańczyk, 2020. "Role of Competences of Graduates in Building Innovations via Knowledge Transfer in the Part of Carpathian Euroregion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Hailing Wang & Libiao Bai & Ning Huang & Qiang Du & Tingting Zhang, 2019. "Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Alicia Mateos-Ronco & Nieves Peiró Torralba, 2019. "Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Bartel-Radic, Anne & Reuter, André (ed.), 2020. "Studien zum Strategischen Management und Personalmanagement," EIKV-Schriftenreihe zum Wissens- und Wertemanagement, European Institute for Knowledge & Value Management (EIKV), Luxembourg, volume 35, number 35.
    20. Magdalena Sobocińska, 2019. "The Role of Marketing in Cultural Institutions in the Context of Assumptions of Sustainable Development Concept—A Polish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10641-:d:642765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.