IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9629-d623104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptation and Returns from Improved Indigenous Small Ruminants in Climatically Challenged Smallholder Systems of Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Winfred Sila

    (Department of Animal Production, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 29053-00100, Kenya)

  • Charles K. Gachuiri

    (Department of Animal Production, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 29053-00100, Kenya)

  • John W. Recha

    (CGIAR Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) East Africa, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 30709-00100, Kenya
    International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 30709-00100, Kenya)

  • James Audho

    (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 30709-00100, Kenya)

  • Julie M. K. Ojango

    (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 30709-00100, Kenya)

Abstract

Improved climate-resilient strains of indigenous sheep and goats were introduced in the Nyando basin of western Kenya in 2013. This study evaluated the performance of the breeds five years after their first introduction, and their contribution to household revenues. Red Maasai and Red Maasai x Dorper sheep and Galla goats introduced in Nyando adapted to the environment and retained performance levels exhibited in their original environments. They have been widely adopted by the farmers and are used for upgrading local breeds through crossbreeding, yielding offspring that are 50% heavier than local breeds at one year of age. Costs for producing the small ruminants tend to increase with land size owned, mainly due to higher costs for managing the health of more livestock. The costs of producing goats are significantly higher than for sheep. Revenues accrued from goat milk contribute to 10% of the revenue from goats. The introduced breeds provided a significant productivity lift in the local livestock population, resulting in higher returns to the smallholder farmers. For long-term sustainability of the productivity gains, a community-based selective mating program using reference sire flocks with an overall goal of good growth, adaptability, and milk production should be adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Winfred Sila & Charles K. Gachuiri & John W. Recha & James Audho & Julie M. K. Ojango, 2021. "Adaptation and Returns from Improved Indigenous Small Ruminants in Climatically Challenged Smallholder Systems of Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9629-:d:623104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayalew, W. & Rischkowsky, B. & King, J. M. & Bruns, E., 2003. "Crossbreds did not generate more net benefits than indigenous goats in Ethiopian smallholdings," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 1137-1156, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abraham, Hagos & Gizaw, Solomon & Urge, Mengistu, 2019. "Simulated alternative breeding schemes for optimizing Begait goat improvement programs in Western Tigray, northern Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Bett, R.C. & Bett, H.K. & Kahi, A.K. & Peters, K.J., 2009. "Evaluation and effectiveness of breeding and production services for dairy goat farmers in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2451-2460, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9629-:d:623104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.