IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9198-d615529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and Psychological Consequences of COVID-19 Online Content at a Lockdown Phase—Europe and Asia Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Marta R. Jabłońska

    (Department of Computer Science in Economics, Institute of Logistics and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, 90-214 Lodz, Poland)

  • Karolina Zajdel

    (Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

  • Radosław Zajdel

    (Department of Computer Science in Economics, Institute of Logistics and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, 90-214 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

After more than a year in a pandemic world, more than 171 million people worldwide have been infected and over 3.5 million have died. The number of those who have suffered mentally due to the pandemic is well above this number. The virus, lockdowns, forced quarantines, and problems related to jobs and everyday functioning have left their mark on mental health. Additionally, the massive spread of COVID-19 content of varying quality in social media is exacerbating this impact. On the other hand, in times of social distancing, these media are an important link with other people and a source of social support. The impact of the COVID-19 content in social media still requires further exploring. This influence on mental health may also vary geographically. There are more and more reports of discrimination against Asians due to COVID-19. We conducted a survey during lockdown in which 1664 respondents took part. After analyzing the impact of COVID-19 content in social media on the level of life satisfaction, anxiety, and depression, we compared this impact between European and Asian respondents. The results showed that dealing with these contents affects the level of anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction. Although most often these relations turned out to be negative, we have also identified those indicating a positive impact. This was particularly noticeable among Asian respondents, who additionally showed a lower relationship between reading COVID-19 content and their mental well-being than European respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta R. Jabłońska & Karolina Zajdel & Radosław Zajdel, 2021. "Social and Psychological Consequences of COVID-19 Online Content at a Lockdown Phase—Europe and Asia Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9198-:d:615529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidi J. Larson, 2018. "The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7727), pages 309-309, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irina A. Novikova & Elizaveta B. Berezina & Marianna E. Sachkova & Nikolay V. Dvoryanchikov & Alexey L. Novikov & Inna B. Bovina, 2024. "To Be Scared or Not to Be Scared: Social Representations of COVID-19 in Young People (A Cross-Cultural Study)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Filipa Seabra & Marta Abelha & António Teixeira & Luísa Aires, 2021. "Learning in Troubled Times: Parents’ Perspectives on Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aida El-Far Cardo & Thomas Kraus & Andrea Kaifie, 2021. "Factors That Shape People’s Attitudes towards the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany—The Influence of MEDIA, Politics and Personal Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Torben E. Agergaard & Màiri E. Smith & Kristian H. Nielsen, 2020. "Vaccine Assemblages on Three HPV Vaccine-Critical Facebook Pages in Denmark from 2012 to 2019," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 339-352.
    3. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Stephan Lewandowsky & Cass R. Sunstein & Ralph Hertwig, 2020. "How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 1102-1109, November.
    4. Gabriel Miao Li & Josh Pasek & Jon A. Krosnick & Tobias H. Stark & Jennifer Agiesta & Gaurav Sood & Trevor Tompson & Wendy Gross, 2022. "Americans’ Attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act: What Role Do Beliefs Play?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 41-54, March.
    5. Jack P Hughes & Alexandros Efstratiou & Sara R Komer & Lilli A Baxter & Milica Vasiljevic & Ana C Leite, 2022. "The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviours," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Alberto Barchetti & Emma Neybert & Susan Powell Mantel & Frank R. Kardes, 2022. "The Half-Truth Effect and Its Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Jiayin Pei & Zhi Lu & Xiaoming Yang, 2022. "What drives people to repost social media messages during the COVID‐19 pandemic? Evidence from the Weibo news microblog," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1609-1626, December.
    8. Katarzyna T. Bolsewicz & Maryke S. Steffens & Bianca Bullivant & Catherine King & Frank Beard, 2021. "“To Protect Myself, My Friends, Family, Workmates and Patients …and to Play My Part”: COVID-19 Vaccination Perceptions among Health and Aged Care Workers in New South Wales, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Briony Swire-Thompson & David Lazer, 2022. "Reducing Health Misinformation in Science: A Call to Arms," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 124-135, March.
    10. Loredana Covolo & Miriam Guana & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Laura Brunelli & Silvana Castaldi & Antonella De Donno & Alessandra Mereu & Marco Verani & Umberto Gelatti, 2022. "Exploring the Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior in a Sample of Italian Women: The “SEI Donna” Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Rino Falcone & Alessandro Sapienza, 2020. "How COVID-19 Changed the Information Needs of Italian Citizens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Amir Karami & Morgan Lundy & Frank Webb & Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy & Brooke W. McKeever & Robert McKeever, 2021. "Identifying and Analyzing Health-Related Themes in Disinformation Shared by Conservative and Liberal Russian Trolls on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Chuhan Wu & Fangzhao Wu & Tao Qi & Wei-Qiang Zhang & Xing Xie & Yongfeng Huang, 2022. "Removing AI’s sentiment manipulation of personalized news delivery," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Kristen Pickles & Tessa Copp & Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz & Rachael H. Dodd & Carissa Bonner & Brooke Nickel & Maryke S. Steffens & Holly Seale & Erin Cvejic & Melody Taba & Brian Chau & Kirsten J. McCaff, 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccine Misperceptions in a Community Sample of Adults Aged 18–49 Years in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Malik Sallam & Deema Dababseh & Huda Eid & Hanan Hasan & Duaa Taim & Kholoud Al-Mahzoum & Ayat Al-Haidar & Alaa Yaseen & Nidaa A. Ababneh & Areej Assaf & Faris G. Bakri & Suzan Matar & Azmi Mahafzah, 2021. "Low COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Is Correlated with Conspiracy Beliefs among University Students in Jordan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Xueyan Li & Ping Fu & Min Li, 2022. "The Complex Media Effects on Civic Participation Intention Amid COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Wuhan College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9198-:d:615529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.