IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8859-d610516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Naturalness for Assessing the Impact of Forestry and Protection on the Quality of Ecosystems in Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Côté

    (Department of Wood and Forestry Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Robert Beauregard

    (Department of Wood and Forestry Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Manuele Margni

    (CIRAIG, Department of Mathematical and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada
    Institute of Sustainable Energy, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1950 Sion, Switzerland)

  • Louis Bélanger

    (Department of Wood and Forestry Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

Abstract

A novel approach is proposed to evaluate the impact of forestry on ecosystem quality in life cycle assessment (LCA) combining a naturalness assessment model with a species richness relationship. The approach is applied to a case study evaluating different forest management strategies involving concomitantly silvicultural scenarios (plantation only, careful logging only or the current mix of both) combined with an increasing share of protected area for wood production in a Québec black spruce forest. The naturalness index is useful to compare forest management scenarios and can help evaluate conservation needs considering the type of management foreseen for wood production. The results indicate that it is preferable to intensify forest management over a small proportion of the forest territory while ensuring strict protection over the remaining portion, compared to extensive forest management over most of the forested area. To explore naturalness introduction in LCA, a provisory curve relating the naturalness index (NI) with the potential disappeared fraction of species (PDF) was developed using species richness data from the literature. LCA impact scores in PDF for producing 1 m 3 of wood might lead to consistent results with the naturalness index but the uncertainty is high while the window leading to consistent results is narrow.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Côté & Robert Beauregard & Manuele Margni & Louis Bélanger, 2021. "Using Naturalness for Assessing the Impact of Forestry and Protection on the Quality of Ecosystems in Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8859-:d:610516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia L. Gray & Samantha L. L. Hill & Tim Newbold & Lawrence N. Hudson & Luca Börger & Sara Contu & Andrew J. Hoskins & Simon Ferrier & Andy Purvis & Jörn P. W. Scharlemann, 2016. "Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Stephanie D. Maier & Jan Paul Lindner & Javier Francisco, 2019. "Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessio Ilari & Sara Fabrizi & Ester Foppa Pedretti, 2022. "European Hophornbeam Biomass for Energy Application: Influence of Different Production Processes and Heating Devices on Environmental Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Eskil Mattsson & Martin Erlandsson & Per Erik Karlsson & Hampus Holmström, 2022. "A Conceptual Landscape-Level Approach to Assess the Impacts of Forestry on Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Henzler & Stephanie D. Maier & Michael Jäger & Rafael Horn, 2020. "SDG-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Innovations in the Field of Urban Surfaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. World Bank, 2024. "Biodiversity for a Livable Planet," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 42309.
    4. Kaikai Dong & Guanglei Hou & Dandan Xu & Honglin He & Zhaoli Liu, 2018. "A Method to Compare the Biodiversity Conservation Effectiveness between Regions based on a Reference Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Nigel Dudley & Adrian Phillips & Thora Amend & Jessica Brown & Sue Stolton, 2016. "Evidence for Biodiversity Conservation in Protected Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Salman, M.M. & Kharroubi, S. & Itani, M. & Talhouk, S.N., 2020. "Using IUCN protected areas management categories as a tool to assess youth preferences for local management of an Important Plant Area (IPA) in Lebanon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. CHEN, Running & PENG, Yisong & REN, Qiang & WU, Jiayu, 2025. "Optimizing global protected areas to address future land use threats to biodiversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Jun Liu & Mengting Yue & Yiming Liu & Ding Wen & Yun Tong, 2022. "The Impact of Tourism on Ecosystem Services Value: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis Based on BRT and GWR Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Xinyuan Liang & Jie He & Xiaobin Jin & Xiaolin Zhang & Jingping Liu & Yinkang Zhou, 2024. "A new framework for optimizing ecological conservation redline of China: A case from an environment‐development conflict area," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1616-1633, June.
    10. Cyprian Chwiałkowski & Adam Zydroń, 2021. "Socio-Economic and Spatial Characteristics of Wielkopolski National Park: Application of the Hedonic Pricing Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Nicolas Marine & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui & Manuel Rodrigo de la O Cabrera & David Escudero & María F. Schmitz, 2020. "Protected Landscapes in Spain: Reasons for Protection and Sustainability of Conservation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Kubacka, Marta & Żywica, Patryk & Vila Subirós, Josep & Bródka, Sylwia & Macias, Andrzej, 2022. "How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & Yingjie Li & Zhenbo Wang & Siao Sun & Sanwei He & Wei Qi & Chao Bao & Haitao Ma & Yupeng Fan & Yuxue Feng & Xiaoping Liu, 2022. "Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Xu, Xibao & Jiang, Bo & Chen, Minkun & Bai, Yang & Yang, Guishan, 2020. "Strengthening the effectiveness of nature reserves in representing ecosystem services: The Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Yu, Chaoyue & Zhang, Zhonghao & Jeppesen, Erik & Gao, Yang & Liu, Yuexin & Liu, Yongjie & Lu, Qingling & Wang, Chenxu & Sun, Ximan, 2024. "Assessment of the effectiveness of China’s protected areas in enhancing ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. de la Fuente, Begoña & Mateo-Sánchez, María C. & Rodríguez, Gema & Gastón, Aitor & Pérez de Ayala, Ramón & Colomina-Pérez, Diana & Melero, María & Saura, Santiago, 2018. "Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: The connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 429-441.
    17. Droste, Nils & Becker, Claudia & Ring, Irene & Santos, Rui, 2017. "Decentralization effects in ecological fiscal transfers: The case of Portugal," UFZ Discussion Papers 3/2017, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    18. Wu-Bing Xu & Shane A. Blowes & Viviana Brambilla & Cher F. Y. Chow & Ada Fontrodona-Eslava & Inês S. Martins & Daniel McGlinn & Faye Moyes & Alban Sagouis & Hideyasu Shimadzu & Roel Klink & Anne E. Ma, 2023. "Regional occupancy increases for widespread species but decreases for narrowly distributed species in metacommunity time series," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Li, Yufei & Hou, Lingling & Liu, Pengfei, 2025. "The impact of downgrading protected areas (PAD) on biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8859-:d:610516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.