IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9050-d437797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indonesian Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Preservice Teachers’ Experiences in STEM-TPACK Design-Based Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ching Sing Chai

    (Department of Curriculum and Instruction & Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong)

  • Yuli Rahmawati

    (Department of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13320, Indonesia)

  • Morris Siu-Yung Jong

    (Department of Curriculum and Instruction & Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong)

Abstract

This paper presents Indonesian preservice teachers’ experiences in designing a Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics-Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (STEM-TPACK) learning website. The framework of TPACK was expanded to include all STEM subjects for the synthesis of the theoretical/design framework. The STEM-TPACK framework is further epitomized as a replicable website to support preservice teachers in designing STEM lesson activities. The framework is also employed to examine preservice teachers’ efficacies and experiences in learning how to design the learning website. Thirty-seven second- and third-year Indonesian preservice teachers from science, mathematics, computer science, and engineering backgrounds formed interdisciplinary groups to design the STEM-TPACK website based on the current secondary school curricula. Data were collected from TPACK-STEM questionnaires, interviews, reflective journals, and observation. The preservice teachers’ efficacy for their STEM-TPACK developed significantly, with large effect sizes, after they co-designed the websites. The results also indicate that the preservice teachers faced challenges in communicating their discipline-based content knowledge when developing the STEM projects. Contextualizing and connecting their content knowledge with real-world design challenges was also difficult for them. Consequently, the preservice teachers realized that teaching is a complex matter, especially when they need to integrate the different disciplines for STEM education. However, this was viewed in a positive light for professional development. This study implies that preservice teachers may benefit from learning by design, employing the TPACK framework in the social setting of interdisciplinary STEM communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching Sing Chai & Yuli Rahmawati & Morris Siu-Yung Jong, 2020. "Indonesian Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Preservice Teachers’ Experiences in STEM-TPACK Design-Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9050-:d:437797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baki Cavlazoglu & Carol Stuessy, 2017. "Changes in science teachers' conceptions and connections of STEM concepts and earthquake engineering," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(3), pages 239-254, May.
    2. Francisco-Javier Hinojo-Lucena & Pablo Dúo-Terrón & Magdalena Ramos Navas-Parejo & Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez & Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero, 2020. "Scientific Performance and Mapping of the Term STEM in Education on the Web of Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Guadalupe Martínez-Borreguero & Juan José Perera-Villalba & Milagros Mateos-Núñez & Francisco Luis Naranjo-Correa, 2020. "Development of ICT-Based Didactic Interventions for Learning Sustainability Content: Cognitive and Affective Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julio Ballesta-Claver & María Fernanda Ayllón Blanco & Isabel Angustias Gómez Pérez, 2021. "A Revisited Conceptual Change in Mathematical-Physics Education from a Neurodidactic Approach: A Pendulum Inquiry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Yimin Ning & Ying Zhou & Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Jihe Chen, 2022. "Teacher Education Interventions on Teacher TPACK: A Meta-Analysis Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Yuri Morales-López & Yerlin Chacón-Camacho & Wilbert Vargas-Delgado, 2021. "TPACK of Prospective Mathematics Teachers at an Early Stage of Training," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Jurado de los Santos & Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & José-Antonio Marín-Marín & Rebeca Soler Costa, 2020. "The Term Equity in Education: A Literature Review with Scientific Mapping in Web of Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Abdel Latif Sellami & Abdulla Al-Ali & Amani Allouh & Saleh Alhazbi, 2023. "Student Attitudes and Interests in STEM in Qatar through the Lens of the Social Cognitive Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & Pedro Jurado de los Santos & María Luisa Pertegal-Felices & Rebeca Soler Costa, 2020. "Bibliometric Study of Scientific Production on the Term Collaborative Learning in Web of Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Chun-Hung Lin & Huei Chu Weng & Kuan-Yu Chen & Leon Yufeng Wu, 2021. "Remodeling the STEM Curriculum for Future Engineers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Angel C. Herrero & Tomás Recio & Piedad Tolmos & M. Pilar Vélez, 2023. "From the Steam Engine to STEAM Education: An Experience with Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9050-:d:437797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.