IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8678-d431487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons in Rural Persuasion: Village Infill Development in Bavaria, Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Gerend

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, and Nutrition, Master of Regional Management Program, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Campus Triesdorf, 91746 Weidenbach, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable rural development in Germany was examined by linking conceptual and applied aspects of the land and housing question, broadly considering the ownership, use, and regulation of land. In the state of Bavaria, a new interagency initiative aims to curb land consumption by persuading villagers to embrace rural infill development. The study explored the background debate leading up to the Space-saving Offensive (Flächensparoffensive), the resource providers involved, and the options for funding actual rural infill building and renovation projects. Here, space-saving managers and other resource providers actively promote the positive societal meaning of central infill sites in contrast to unsustainable land consumption. In addition to the communications campaign, planning, regulatory, and funding interventions round out the multi-level initiative, as described in this study. A modern barn reuse exemplifies the Bavarian bundle of resources, while demonstrating how modern village infill redevelopment also contests oversimplified notions of stagnant rural peripheries. The initiative’s focus on linking key resources and bolstering communications can be read as validation for a more social perspective on land consumption and village infill development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Gerend, 2020. "Lessons in Rural Persuasion: Village Infill Development in Bavaria, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8678-:d:431487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Dillmann & Volker Beckmann, 2018. "Do Administrative Incentives for the Containment of Cities Work? An Analysis of the Accelerated Procedure for Binding Land-Use Plans for Inner Urban Development in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Langer, Sebastian & Korzhenevych, Artem, 2018. "The effect of industrial and commercial land consumption on municipal tax revenue: Evidence from Bavaria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 279-287.
    3. Miosga, Manfred & Büchs, Sebastian & Dudek, Simon & Klee, Andreas & Klein, Ralf & Odewald, Christiane & Paesler, Reinhard & Weick, Theophil & Zademach, Hans-Martin, 2020. "Neuorientierung der Raumordnung in Bayern," Positionspapier aus der ARL 117, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    4. Sara Safransky, 2018. "Land Justice as a Historical Diagnostic: Thinking with Detroit," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(2), pages 499-512, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Horst & Nathan McClintock & Adrien Baysse-Lainé & Ségolène Darly & Flaminia Paddeu & Coline Perrin & Kristin Reynolds & Christophe-Toussaint Soulard, 2021. "Translating land justice through comparison: a US–French dialogue and research agenda," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 865-880, December.
    2. Thiess Büttner, 2021. "Land Use and Fiscal Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series 8958, CESifo.
    3. Saeed Solaymani, 2020. "Assessing the economic and social impacts of fiscal policies," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(3), pages 671-694, March.
    4. Umberto Mecca & Paolo Piantanida & Francesco Prizzon & Manuela Rebaudengo, 2019. "Impact of Brownfield Sites on Local Energy Production as Resilient Response to Land Contamination: A Case Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Li, Yuqing & Zheng, Caigui, 2023. "The distribution characteristics and driving mechanism of vacant land in Chengdu, China: A perspective of urban shrinkage and expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Ping Zhang & Xiaojuan Yang & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "Matching Relationship between Urban Service Industry Land Expansion and Economy Growth in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, May.
    7. Jehling, Mathias & Krehl, Angelika & Krüger, Tobias, 2021. "The more the merrier? Questioning the role of new commercial and industrial locations for employment growth in German city regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Junheng Qi & Mingxing Hu & Bing Han & Jiemin Zheng & Hui Wang, 2022. "Decoupling Relationship between Industrial Land Expansion and Economic Development in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Camille Hochedez, 2022. "Food justice: processes, practices and perspectives," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(4), pages 305-320, December.
    10. Henger, Ralph & Straub, Tim & Weinhardt, Christof, 2023. "Tradable planning permits in the field: Executive experimental results from Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Ackerschott, Adriana & Kohlhase, Esther & Vollmer, Anita & Hörisch, Jacob & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2023. "Steering of land use in the context of sustainable development: A systematic review of economic instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Meyer, Markus A. & Früh-Müller, Andrea, 2020. "Patterns and drivers of recent agricultural land-use change in Southern Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Danxia Zhang & Juanfeng Zhang & Rui Han & Dongsheng Zhan, 2022. "Two‐stage development, allocation strategies' effect, and industrial land policies' adjustment, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 890-909, June.
    14. Götze, Vera & Hartmann, Thomas, 2021. "Why municipalities grow: The influence of fiscal incentives on municipal land policies in Germany and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Fan, Xin & Qiu, Sainan & Sun, Yukun, 2020. "Land finance dependence and urban land marketization in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8678-:d:431487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.