IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7672-d414812.html

Ecosystem Health Assessment of Shennongjia National Park, China

Author

Listed:
  • Huan Wang

    (School of Earth Sciences and Surveying and Mapping Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    Satellite Environment Application Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Peng Hou

    (Satellite Environment Application Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Jinbao Jiang

    (School of Earth Sciences and Surveying and Mapping Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Rulin Xiao

    (Satellite Environment Application Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Jun Zhai

    (Satellite Environment Application Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Zhuo Fu

    (Satellite Environment Application Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Jing Hou

    (Satellite Environment Application Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China)

Abstract

Ecosystem health assessment is an important part of improving the management of national parks. In this paper, Shennongjia National Park is taken as the study region. By using satellite remote sensing data from 2000 to 2018, based on the Vitality Organization Resilience (VOR) model, an ecosystem health assessment is created and its spatiotemporal characteristics are analyzed. In the whole region, the ecosystem’s health level has gradually improved; the rate of improvement of the ecosystem’s health level from 2016 to 2018 has been 2.5-times that of the overall rate and the trend of improvement has been obvious. The rate of improvement of the ecosystem’s health level of non-nature protection areas has improved two-fold; the same is true of nature protection areas, and the stability change trend of the two areas has basically been the same. The establishment of national parks has played a significant role in promoting the health of the regional ecosystem. In future planning, relevant departments should pay attention to the ecological protection and restoration of the area and optimize the traditional area layout of Shennongjia National Park.

Suggested Citation

  • Huan Wang & Peng Hou & Jinbao Jiang & Rulin Xiao & Jun Zhai & Zhuo Fu & Jing Hou, 2020. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of Shennongjia National Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7672-:d:414812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sohel, Md Shawkat Islam & Ahmed Mukul, Sharif & Burkhard, Benjamin, 2015. "Landscape׳s capacities to supply ecosystem services in Bangladesh: A mapping assessment for Lawachara National Park," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 128-135.
    2. Mukul, Sharif A. & Sohel, Md. Shawkat I. & Herbohn, John & Inostroza, Luis & König, Hannes, 2017. "Integrating ecosystem services supply potential from future land-use scenarios in protected area management: A Bangladesh case study," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 355-364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fanfan Ju & Liuzhu Chen & Jiejun Zheng & Zhanqiang Chen & Xiaoli Wang & Xinxing Xia, 2022. "Elevation-Dependent Fluctuations of the Soil Properties in a Subtropical Forest of Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Hang Shu & Chunwang Xiao & Ting Ma & Weiguo Sang, 2021. "Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Shaokang Fu & Lin Zhao & Zhi Qiao & Tong Sun & Meng Sun & Yuying Hao & Siyu Hu & Yanchang Zhang, 2021. "Development of Ecosystem Health Assessment (EHA) and Application Method: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Hao Luo & Qing Zhao & Wan-Hui Qian & Chi Zhang & Ling-Yu Zhang & Xiao-Jun Wu, 2025. "Landscape Health Assessment of Suburban Forest Parks with Different Land Use Intensities and Grid Scales," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Jingwei Wang & Jinhe Zhang & Peijia Wang & Xiaobin Ma & Liangjian Yang & Leying Zhou, 2022. "Progress in Ecosystem Health Research and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Das, Manob & Das, Arijit & Saikh, Selim, 2024. "Estimating supply-demand mismatches for optimization of sustainable land use planning in a rapidly growing urban agglomeration (India)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Matthias Bürgi & Panna Ali & Afroza Chowdhury & Andreas Heinimann & Cornelia Hett & Felix Kienast & Manoranjan Kumar Mondal & Bishnu Raj Upreti & Peter H. Verburg, 2017. "Integrated Landscape Approach: Closing the Gap between Theory and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Arturo Sanchez-Porras & María Guadalupe Tenorio-Arvide & Ricardo Darío Peña-Moreno & María Laura Sampedro-Rosas & Sonia Emilia Silva-Gómez, 2018. "Evaluation of the Potential Change to the Ecosystem Service Provision Due to Industrialization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Harald Zepp & Luis Inostroza, 2021. "Who Pays the Bill? Assessing Ecosystem Services Losses in an Urban Planning Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Sharif A. Mukul & Narayan Saha, 2017. "Conservation Benefits of Tropical Multifunctional Land-Uses in and Around a Forest Protected Area of Bangladesh," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Yanru Wang & Xiaojuan Zhang & Peihao Peng, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Changes of Land-Use/Land Cover Change and the Effects on Ecosystem Service Values in Derong County, China, from 1992–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Lydia Gorn & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2018. "Improving the Matrix-Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provision—The Case of Regional Land Use Planning under Climate Change in the Region of Halle, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Madleina Gerecke & Oskar Hagen & Janine Bolliger & Anna M. Hersperger & Felix Kienast & Bronwyn Price & Loïc Pellissier, 2019. "Assessing potential landscape service trade-offs driven by urbanization in Switzerland," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Dolan Kanti Bhattacharjee & M. Mahfuzur Rahman & Mohammad Musharof Hossain & Shaikh Bokhtear Uddin & Sajib Rudra, 2022. "Floristic Composition and Vegetation Diversity Status of Khagrachari Sadar, Chattogram, Bangladesh," European Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, European Open Science, vol. 3(4), pages 25-37, July.
    10. Gaglio, Mattias & Aschonitis, Vassilis & Castaldelli, Giuseppe & Fano, Elisa Anna, 2020. "Land use intensification rather than land cover change affects regulating services in the mountainous Adige river basin (Italy)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. Maria Cerreta & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "Landscape Services Assessment: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Qing Qin & Yuan Huang & Jingru Liu & Dai Chen & Ling Zhang & Jian Qiu & Hongli Tan & Yali Wen, 2019. "The Landscape Patterns of the Giant Panda Protection Area in Sichuan Province and Their Impact on Giant Pandas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Wright, William C.C. & Eppink, Florian V. & Greenhalgh, Suzie, 2017. "Are ecosystem service studies presenting the right information for decision making?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 128-139.
    14. Blanco, Victor & Holzhauer, Sascha & Brown, Calum & Lagergren, Fredrik & Vulturius, Gregor & Lindeskog, Mats & Rounsevell, Mark D.A., 2017. "The effect of forest owner decision-making, climatic change and societal demands on land-use change and ecosystem service provision in Sweden," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 174-208.
    15. Burkhard, Benjamin & Müller, Anja & Müller, Felix & Grescho, Volker & Anh, Quynh & Arida, Gertrudo & Bustamante, Jesus Victor (Jappan) & Van Chien, Ho & Heong, K.L. & Escalada, Monina & Marquez, Leona, 2015. "Land cover-based ecosystem service assessment of irrigated rice cropping systems in southeast Asia—An explorative study," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 76-87.
    16. Hui Wen & Jiquan Chen & Zhifang Wang, 2020. "Disproportioned Performances of Protected Areas in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Ahammad, Ronju & Stacey, Natasha & Sunderland, Terry, 2021. "Analysis of forest-related policies for supporting ecosystem services-based forest management in Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    18. Yingchao Li & Zhiyuan Fan & Zhenhao Li & Xuefang Zhang & Ruyu Du & Minghui Li, 2021. "Exploring Development Trends of Terrestrial Ecosystem Health—A Case Study from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. van den Belt, Marjan & Stevens, Sharon M., 2016. "Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 60-72.
    20. Azime Tezer & Zeynep Turkay & Osman Uzun & Fatih Terzi & Pinar Koylu & Elif Karacor & Nilgun Okay & Melek Kaya, 2020. "Ecosystem services-based multi-criteria assessment for ecologically sensitive watershed management," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2431-2450, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7672-:d:414812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.