IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1611-d1720332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Health Assessment of Suburban Forest Parks with Different Land Use Intensities and Grid Scales

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Luo

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 233# 1st Guangshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Qing Zhao

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 233# 1st Guangshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Wan-Hui Qian

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 233# 1st Guangshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Chi Zhang

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 233# 1st Guangshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Ling-Yu Zhang

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 233# 1st Guangshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Xiao-Jun Wu

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 233# 1st Guangshan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China)

Abstract

Landscape health assessments are crucial for balancing conservation and use practices. However, studies considering different land use intensities and grid scales from a functional perspective are limited. This study aimed to develop a landscape classification and indicator system based on functional characteristics using Xiqiao Mountain National Forest Park and Yunyong National Forest Park as research objects. The entropy weight method was used to determine indicator weights, and grid analysis and spatial interpolation were used to analyze the spatial distribution, impact differences, and factors influencing landscape health. The effect of different grid scales on landscape health under varying land use intensities first weakened and then strengthened with increasing grid scales; the optimal grid scales for the two parks were 54 × 54 m and 66 × 66 m, respectively. The forest/non-forest area ratio decreased as the health level of the landscape increased. At the optimal grid scale, the threshold range of the forest/non-forest area ratio for achieving optimal landscape health was 4.46–5.81 and 0.79–0.87 in the two parks, respectively. The results indicate that improved landscape health in suburban forest parks requires the intensive development of construction land, enhanced forest management, and functional synergistic designs to promote coordinated functional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Luo & Qing Zhao & Wan-Hui Qian & Chi Zhang & Ling-Yu Zhang & Xiao-Jun Wu, 2025. "Landscape Health Assessment of Suburban Forest Parks with Different Land Use Intensities and Grid Scales," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1611-:d:1720332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1611-:d:1720332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.