IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1433-d212116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics and Forecasting of Municipal Solid Waste Generation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ane Pan

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Linxiu Yu

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qing Yang

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

The clear understanding of characteristics and trends of solid waste generation is essential for the optimization of waste collection and treatment systems. Taking 651 cities in China as a sample, this study adopts correlation analysis and the Q-type clustering model to explore the characteristics and general trends of solid waste generation (SWG) of five cities of different scale from 2007 to 2016. The results show that the trends of average amount and the annual per capita SWG are diversified in cities of different scale. The permanent residents and regional GDP have prominent impacts on SWG in large cities, megacities, and super megacities compared to those from small and medium-sized cities. The urban area is highly correlated with the SWG of all cities. Nearly one third of cities are characterized by high population density, high economic growth and low SWG. Furthermore, the factor models are developed to forecast the amount of SWG, which have a descriptive capacity of 96%, 95.4%, 92.6%, and 84.2% for the overall cities, large cities, medium-sized cities and small cities respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ane Pan & Linxiu Yu & Qing Yang, 2019. "Characteristics and Forecasting of Municipal Solid Waste Generation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1433-:d:212116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni De Feo & Sabino De Gisi, 2010. "Domestic Separation and Collection of Municipal Solid Waste: Opinion and Awareness of Citizens and Workers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(5), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johanna Karina Solano Meza & David Orjuela Yepes & Javier Rodrigo-Ilarri & María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of Support Vector Machines and Long Short-Term Memory Artificial Neural Networks in Municipal Solid Waste Management Models in Megacities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Bei Xiong & Ruimei Wang, 2020. "Effect of Environmental Regulation on Industrial Solid Waste Pollution in China: From the Perspective of Formal Environmental Regulation and Informal Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Ludovic Fontaine & Dominique Morau & Jean-Philippe Praene, 2022. "Analysis and Estimation of Short Term Residual Household Waste Production: Case Study Reunion Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Bogusław Wowrzeczka, 2021. "City of Waste—Importance of Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Altaf Hussain Kanhar & Shaoqing Chen & Fei Wang, 2020. "Incineration Fly Ash and Its Treatment to Possible Utilization: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-35, December.
    6. Fu Chen & Xiaoxiao Li & Yongjun Yang & Huping Hou & Gang-Jun Liu & Shaoliang Zhang, 2019. "Storing E-waste in Green Infrastructure to Reduce Perceived Value Loss through Landfill Siting and Landscaping: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Vidas Raudonis & Agne Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene & Linas Eidimtas, 2022. "ANN Hybrid Model for Forecasting Landfill Waste Potential in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni De Feo & Aurelio Di Domenico & Carmen Ferrara & Salvatore Abate & Libero Sesti Osseo, 2020. "Evolution of Waste Cooking Oil Collection in an Area with Long-Standing Waste Management Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Sudipta Bhawal Mukherji & Makiko Sekiyama & Takashi Mino & Bharati Chaturvedi, 2016. "Resident Knowledge and Willingness to Engage in Waste Management in Delhi, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Khuc, Quy Van & Dang, Phuong-Thao & Tran, Phuong-Mai & Nguyen, Thuy & Pham, Phu & Tran, Duc-Trung, 2022. "Exploring strategies to tackle plastic waste pollution: Evidence from Vietnamese household survey and Bayesian approach," OSF Preprints m73ef, Center for Open Science.
    4. Zhujie Chu & Wenna Wang & Bairong Wang & Jun Zhuang, 2016. "Research on Factors Influencing Municipal Household Solid Waste Separate Collection: Bayesian Belief Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Altaf Hussain Kanhar & Shaoqing Chen & Fei Wang, 2020. "Incineration Fly Ash and Its Treatment to Possible Utilization: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-35, December.
    6. Cody Jones, 2013. "Moving Beyond Profit: Expanding Research to Better Understand Business Environmental Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-29, June.
    7. Caroline M. Y. Law & Ernest K. S. Lee & K. L. Au, 2022. "Hong Kong Citizens’ Socio-Demographic Dynamics of Urban Yard Waste Facilities Siting and Legislation Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Giovanni De Feo & Carmen Ferrara & Cristina Iuliano & Alberto Grosso, 2016. "LCA of the Collection, Transportation, Treatment and Disposal of Source Separated Municipal Waste: A Southern Italy Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Halkos, George & Petrou, Kleoniki Natalia, 2018. "‘Waste culture’ assessment using Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s cultural dimensions – an EU case study," MPRA Paper 90506, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1433-:d:212116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.