IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p886-d204418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoning Hu

    (College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Meizi Si

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Han Luo

    (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Mancai Guo

    (College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Jijun Wang

    (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

Abstract

In order to evaluate ecological technology scientifically, we constructed a modular “three-stage evaluation method” based on qualitative evaluation, semiquantitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation, and established the theoretical models of the four kinds of ecotechnology, such as soil and water conservation technology, desertification governance technology, rocky desertification governance technology and ecological restoration technology. We gave the quantification criteria of the first-level and second-level index commonly shared by four kinds of ecotechnology and defined the quantification criteria of the third-level index of reflecting the heterogeneity of soil and water conservation technology. An ecotechnology evaluation model combining Analytic Hierarchy Process and Logistic regression was established based on soil and water conservation technology. The rationality of the evaluation method and model were verified by field investigation data of soil and water conservation technology in Gaoxigou. The evaluation method and model could provide scientific basis for the effective introduction and popularization of ecotechnology.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoning Hu & Meizi Si & Han Luo & Mancai Guo & Jijun Wang, 2019. "The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:886-:d:204418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Shi & Tiange Shi & Zhaoping Yang & Zhi Wang & Fang Han & Cuirong Wang, 2018. "Effect of Roads on Ecological Corridors Used for Wildlife Movement in a Natural Heritage Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Xu, Zihan & Wei, Hejie & Fan, Weiguo & Wang, Xuechao & Huang, Bingling & Lu, Nachuan & Ren, Jiahui & Dong, Xiaobin, 2018. "Energy modeling simulation of changes in ecosystem services before and after the implementation of a Grain-for-Green program on the Loess Plateau—A case study of the Zhifanggou valley in Ansai Count," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 32-43.
    3. Hongfei Zhao & Hongming He & Jingjing Wang & Chunyu Bai & Chuangjuan Zhang, 2018. "Vegetation Restoration and Its Environmental Effects on the Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Kamyar Kianpour & Ahmad Jusoh & Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Fausto Cavallaro & Khalil Md. Nor & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2017. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intention to Return the End of Life Electronic Products through Reverse Supply Chain Management for Reuse, Repair and Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Qirui Li & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Peter Zander & Zhen Liu & Klaus Müller, 2016. "Sustainability of Smallholder Agriculture in Semi-Arid Areas under Land Set-aside Programs: A Case Study from China’s Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Xiaoying Liang & Hui Jia & Hai Chen & Di Liu & Hang Zhang, 2018. "Landscape Sustainability in the Loess Hilly Gully Region of the Loess Plateau: A Case Study of Mizhi County in Shanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tong, De & Sun, Yiyu & Tang, Junqing & Luo, Zhenying & Lu, Jinfeng & Liu, Xuan, 2023. "Modeling the interaction of internal and external systems of rural settlements: The case of Guangdong, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Huayan Shen & Kexin Bi & Yu Gao & Meisha Wang, 2020. "How does the Traditional Heavy Industry Use Ecotechnology to Achieve the Ecological Innovation Goal? Analysis Based on Expert Survey in China’s Shipbuilding Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jifeng Lin & Yunhong Lin & Hongfei Zhao & Hongming He, 2022. "Soil Erosion Processes and Geographical Differentiation in Shaanxi during 1980–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    3. Martina Artmann, 2013. "Response-Efficiency-Assessment: A Conceptual Framework For Rating Policy'S Efficiency To Meet Sustainable Development On The Example Of Soil Sealing Management," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-33.
    4. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    5. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Mohammad Reza Salehizadeh & Mahdi Amidi Koohbijari & Hassan Nouri & Akın Taşcıkaraoğlu & Ozan Erdinç & João P. S. Catalão, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization Model for Optimal Placement of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Elena C. Prenovitz & Peter K. Hazlett & Chandler S. Reilly, 2023. "Can Markets Improve Recycling Performance? A Cross-Country Regression Analysis and Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Nasiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Shokouhyar, Sajjad, 2021. "Actual consumers' response to purchase refurbished smartphones: Exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Gözaçan Nazlıcan & Lafci Çisem, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Logistics Firms," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, February.
    10. Jiabin Liu & Ji Han, 2017. "Does a Certain Rule Exist in the Long-Term Change of a City’s Livability? Evidence from New York, Tokyo, and Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Wei Xu & Yuqi Miao & Shuaimeng Zhu & Jimin Cheng & Jingwei Jin, 2023. "Modelling the Geographical Distribution Pattern of Apple Trees on the Loess Plateau, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Clara Moreira Senne & Josiane Palma Lima & Fábio Favaretto, 2021. "An Index for the Sustainability of Integrated Urban Transport and Logistics: The Case Study of São Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Md Monjurul Islam & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "Land Suitability and Insurance Premiums: A GIS-based Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Sustainable Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    16. Roberta Mele & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "The Effectiveness of Geographical Data in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Landscape Services †," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Chatterjee, Sidharta, 2017. "A Primer on Social Knowledge," MPRA Paper 81105, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Sep 2017.
    18. Mariia Dushenko & Clemet Thærie Bjorbæk & Kenn Steger-Jensen, 2018. "Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Pinto & Glória de Fátima Pereira Venturini & Salvatore Digiesi & Francesco Facchini & Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing under a Strong Sustainability Perspective—An Ecological Neutrality Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-40, November.
    20. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:886-:d:204418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.