IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p5969-d280732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS-Based and Statistical Approaches in Archaeological Predictive Modelling (NE Romania)

Author

Listed:
  • Ionut Cristi Nicu

    (High North Department, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU), Fram Centre, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway)

  • Alin Mihu-Pintilie

    (Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Science Research Department, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi (UAIC), St. Lascăr Catargi 54, 700107 Iaşi, Romania)

  • James Williamson

    (Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, P.O. Box 4200, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada)

Abstract

Archaeological predictive modelling (APM) is an important method for archaeological research and cultural heritage management. This study tests the viability of a new statistical method for APM. Frequency ratio (FR) is widely used in the field of geosciences but has not been applied in APM. This study tests FR in a catchment from the north-eastern part of Romania to predict the possible location(s) of Eneolithic sites. In order to do that, three factors were used: soils, heat load index and slope position classification. Eighty percent of the sites were used to build the model, while the remaining 20% were used to externally test the model’s performance. The final APM was made with the help of GIS software and classified into four susceptibility classes: very high, high, medium and low. The success rate curve and the prediction rate curve reported values of the area under curve (AUC) of 0.72, and 0.75 respectively. The Kvamme’s Gain value for the model has a value of 0.56. Therefore, the final APM is reliable, so FR is a viable technique for APM. The final map can be successfully used in archaeological research, cultural heritage management and protection, preventive archaeology and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionut Cristi Nicu & Alin Mihu-Pintilie & James Williamson, 2019. "GIS-Based and Statistical Approaches in Archaeological Predictive Modelling (NE Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5969-:d:280732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omid Rahmati & Ali Haghizadeh & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Farhad Noormohamadi, 2016. "Gully erosion susceptibility mapping: the role of GIS-based bivariate statistical models and their comparison," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 1231-1258, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitris Goussios & Ioannis Faraslis, 2022. "Integrated Remote Sensing and 3D GIS Methodology to Strengthen Public Participation and Identify Cultural Resources," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    2. Ali Azedou & Said Lahssini & Abdellatif Khattabi & Modeste Meliho & Nabil Rifai, 2021. "A Methodological Comparison of Three Models for Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in the Rural Municipality of El Faid (Morocco)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Md. Monirul Islam & Shusuke Matsushita & Ryozo Noguchi & Tofael Ahamed, 2022. "A damage-based crop insurance system for flash flooding: a satellite remote sensing and econometric approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 47-89, February.
    4. Kennedy Were & Syphyline Kebeney & Harrison Churu & James Mumo Mutio & Ruth Njoroge & Denis Mugaa & Boniface Alkamoi & Wilson Ng’etich & Bal Ram Singh, 2023. "Spatial Prediction and Mapping of Gully Erosion Susceptibility Using Machine Learning Techniques in a Degraded Semi-Arid Region of Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Amiya Gayen & Sungjae Park & Chang-Wook Lee & Saro Lee, 2018. "Assessment of Landslide-Prone Areas and Their Zonation Using Logistic Regression, LogitBoost, and NaïveBayes Machine-Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Youssef Kassem & Hüseyin Gökçekuş & Nour Alijl, 2023. "Gridded Precipitation Datasets and Gauge Precipitation Products for Driving Hydrological Models in the Dead Sea Region, Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Sandipta Debanshi & Swades Pal, 2020. "Assessing gully erosion susceptibility in Mayurakshi river basin of eastern India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 883-914, February.
    8. Nerea Martín-Raya & Jaime Díaz-Pacheco & Abel López-Díez & Pedro Dorta Antequera & Amílcar Cabrera, 2023. "A lava flow simulation experience oriented to disaster risk reduction, early warning systems and response during the 2021 volcanic eruption in Cumbre Vieja, La Palma," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 3331-3351, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5969-:d:280732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.