IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p708-d134839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daily Monitoring of Shallow and Fine-Grained Water Patterns in Wet Grasslands Combining Aerial LiDAR Data and In Situ Piezometric Measurements

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Rapinel

    (CNRS UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Univ. Rennes, Avenue Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France)

  • Nicolas Rossignol

    (CNRS UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Univ. Rennes, Avenue Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France)

  • Oliver Gore

    (CNRS UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Univ. Rennes, Avenue Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France)

  • Olivier Jambon

    (CNRS UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Univ. Rennes, Avenue Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France)

  • Guillaume Bouger

    (Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers de Rennes, Univ. Rennes, Avenue Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France
    Current address: CNRS UMR 6042 GEOLAB, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.)

  • Jérome Mansons

    (Établissement Public du Marais Poitevin, 1 rue Richelieu, 85400 Luçon, France)

  • Anne Bonis

    (Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers de Rennes, Univ. Rennes, Avenue Général Leclerc, 35000 Rennes, France)

Abstract

The real-time monitoring of hydrodynamics in wetlands at fine spatial and temporal scales is crucial for understanding ecological and hydrological processes. The key interest of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data is its ability to accurately detect microtopography. However, how such data may account for subtle wetland flooding changes in both space and time still needs to be tested, even though the degree to which these changes impact biodiversity patterns is of upmost importance. This study assesses the use of 1 m × 1 m resolution aerial LiDAR data in combination with in situ piezometric measurements in order to predict the flooded areas at a daily scale along a one-year hydrological period. The simulation was applied over 663 ha of wet grasslands distributed on six sites across the Marais Poitevin (France). A set of seven remote sensing images was used as the reference data in order to validate the simulation and provide a high overall accuracy (76–94%). The best results were observed in areas where the ditch density was low, whereas the highly drained sites showed a discrepancy with the predicted flooded areas. The landscape proportion index was calculated for the daily steps. The results highlighted the spatiotemporal dynamics of the shallow flooded areas. We showed that the differences in the flooding durations among the years were mainly related to a narrow contrast in topography (40 cm), and occurred over a short period of time (two months).

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Rapinel & Nicolas Rossignol & Oliver Gore & Olivier Jambon & Guillaume Bouger & Jérome Mansons & Anne Bonis, 2018. "Daily Monitoring of Shallow and Fine-Grained Water Patterns in Wet Grasslands Combining Aerial LiDAR Data and In Situ Piezometric Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:708-:d:134839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/708/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/708/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierfranco Costabile & Francesco Macchione & Luigi Natale & Gabriella Petaccia, 2015. "Flood mapping using LIDAR DEM. Limitations of the 1-D modeling highlighted by the 2-D approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(1), pages 181-204, May.
    2. Maclean, Ilya M.D. & Bennie, Jonathan J. & Scott, Amanda J. & Wilson, Robert J., 2012. "A high-resolution model of soil and surface water conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 237, pages 109-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weilian Li & Jun Zhu & Yunhao Zhang & Lin Fu & Yuhang Gong & Ya Hu & Yungang Cao, 2020. "An on-demand construction method of disaster scenes for multilevel users," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(2), pages 409-428, March.
    2. Xiaoling Wang & Wenlong Chen & Zhengyin Zhou & Yushan Zhu & Cheng Wang & Zhen Liu, 2017. "Three-dimensional flood routing of a dam break based on a high-precision digital model of a dense urban area," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(3), pages 1147-1174, April.
    3. Marco Criado & Antonio Martínez-Graña & Javier Sánchez San Román & Fernando Santos-Francés, 2018. "Flood Risk Evaluation in Urban Spaces: The Study Case of Tormes River (Salamanca, Spain)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Alahacoon, Niranga & Matheswaran, Karthikeyan & Pani, Peejush & Amarnath, Giriraj, "undated". "A decadal historical satellite data and rainfall trend analysis (2001–2016) for flood hazard mapping in Sri Lanka," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H048581, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Arunima Sarkar Basu & Laurence William Gill & Francesco Pilla & Bidroha Basu, 2022. "Assessment of Climate Change Impact on the Annual Maximum Flood in an Urban River in Dublin, Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Shokoufeh Khojeh & Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani & Seiyed Mossa Hosseini, 2022. "Effect of DEM resolution in flood modeling: a case study of Gorganrood River, Northeastern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 2673-2693, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:708-:d:134839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.