IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4094-d181339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Terrestrial Ecotoxic Impacts Stemming from Emissions of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from Manure: A Spatially Differentiated Assessment in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Sydow

    (Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznań, Poland)

  • Łukasz Chrzanowski

    (Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznań, Poland)

  • Alexandra Leclerc

    (Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Centrifugevej Bygn. 371, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Alexis Laurent

    (Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Centrifugevej Bygn. 371, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Mikołaj Owsianiak

    (Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Centrifugevej Bygn. 371, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

Metallic elements present in livestock manure as co-contaminants have the potential to cause terrestrial ecotoxic impacts when the manure is used as fertilizer on agricultural soils. The magnitude of this impact at country scale in Europe has, to date, not been quantified. Here, we address this knowledge gap by combining recently developed national emission inventories of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn releases from manure with metal- and soil-specific comparative toxicity potentials (CTP) calculated for cropland grid cells at 1 × 1 km resolution for 33 European countries. The CTPs account for speciation in environmental fate, exposure and effects, including reduction in the solid-phase reactivity of a metal when it is associated with organic carbon present in the manure. Given the scarcity of inventory data at sub-national level, it was assumed that each unit area of cropland within a given country has the same probability to receive manure. The resulting CTPs span a range of several orders of magnitude reflecting the influence of soil type and properties on the speciation patterns and resulting CTP values. However, when combined with the use of manure in each European country, the resulting national impact scores were mainly explained by the total mass input of metal released to soil rather than by geographic variability in the CTP values. Simple linear regression is then sufficient to predict terrestrial ecotoxic impacts from input mass. Although some changes in ranking of metals and countries were observed, both mass- and impact-based comparisons between metals agreed that Zn and Cu are dominant contributors to total impacts, and that top contributing countries were those emitting the largest amounts of metals. Our findings show that spatially differentiated impact assessment is important for ranking of countries when differences in national emission inventories between countries are smaller than a factor of two (Ni), a factor of three (Cd, Cu, Zn) or a factor of four (Pb). In other cases, ranking of countries can be based on national emission inventories.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Sydow & Łukasz Chrzanowski & Alexandra Leclerc & Alexis Laurent & Mikołaj Owsianiak, 2018. "Terrestrial Ecotoxic Impacts Stemming from Emissions of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from Manure: A Spatially Differentiated Assessment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4094-:d:181339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgio Provolo & Giulia Manuli & Alberto Finzi & Giorgio Lucchini & Elisabetta Riva & Gian Attilio Sacchi, 2018. "Effect of Pig and Cattle Slurry Application on Heavy Metal Composition of Maize Grown on Different Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Xi Zhang & Saiqi Zeng & Shibao Chen & Yibing Ma, 2018. "Change of the Extractability of Cadmium Added to Different Soils: Aging Effect and Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Ivan Viveros Santos & Cécile Bulle & Annie Levasseur & Louise Deschênes, 2018. "Regionalized Terrestrial Ecotoxicity Assessment of Copper-Based Fungicides Applied in Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Ailin Zhang & Veronica Cortes & Bradley Phelps & Hal Van Ryswyk & Tanja Srebotnjak, 2018. "Experimental Analysis of Soil and Mandarin Orange Plants Treated with Heavy Metals Found in Oilfield-Produced Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Panos Panagos & Cristiano Ballabio & Emanuele Lugato & Arwyn Jones & Pasquale Borrelli & Simone Scarpa & Alberto Orgiazzi & Luca Montanarella, 2018. "Potential Sources of Anthropogenic Copper Inputs to European Agricultural Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Pickard, Brian R. & Daniel, Jessica & Mehaffey, Megan & Jackson, Laura E. & Neale, Anne, 2015. "EnviroAtlas: A new geospatial tool to foster ecosystem services science and resource management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 45-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Klejnowska & Mateusz Sydow & Rafał Michalski & Magdalena Bogacka, 2022. "Life Cycle Impacts of Recycling of Black Mass Obtained from End-of-Life Zn-C and Alkaline Batteries Using Waelz Kiln," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Leidy Rendón-Castrillón & Margarita Ramírez-Carmona & Carlos Ocampo-López & Luis Gómez-Arroyave, 2023. "Bioleaching Techniques for Sustainable Recovery of Metals from Solid Matrices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Köninger, Julia & Lugato, Emanuele & Panagos, Panos & Kochupillai, Mrinalini & Orgiazzi, Alberto & Briones, Maria J.I., 2021. "Manure management and soil biodiversity: Towards more sustainable food systems in the EU," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Mohamed F. Sallam & Chelsea Fizer & Andrew N. Pilant & Pai-Yei Whung, 2017. "Systematic Review: Land Cover, Meteorological, and Socioeconomic Determinants of Aedes Mosquito Habitat for Risk Mapping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Jianqiang Wu & Chenyan Sha & Min Wang & Chunmei Ye & Peng Li & Shenfa Huang, 2021. "Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Soil Bacteria in Maize Fields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Matzek, Virginia & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Kragt, Marit, 2019. "Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 79-86.
    5. Schmidt, Stefan & Seppelt, Ralf, 2018. "Information content of global ecosystem service databases and their suitability for decision advice," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 22-40.
    6. Charles, Michael & Ziv, Guy & Bohrer, Gil & Bakshi, Bhavik R., 2020. "Connecting air quality regulating ecosystem services with beneficiaries through quantitative serviceshed analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    7. Leidy Rendón-Castrillón & Margarita Ramírez-Carmona & Carlos Ocampo-López & Luis Gómez-Arroyave, 2023. "Bioleaching Techniques for Sustainable Recovery of Metals from Solid Matrices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Schirpke, Uta & Ghermandi, Andrea & Sinclair, Michael & Van Berkel, Derek & Fox, Nathan & Vargas, Leonardo & Willemen, Louise, 2023. "Emerging technologies for assessing ecosystem services: A synthesis of opportunities and challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Ahmed Gad & Bandar A. Al-Mur & Waleed A. Alsiary & Sahar M. Abd El Bakey, 2022. "Optimization of Carboniferous Egyptian Kaolin Treatment for Pharmaceutical Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Andrew Almeter & Arik Tashie & Andrew Procter & Tara McAlexander & Douglas Browning & Charles Rudder & Laura Jackson & Rochelle Araujo, 2018. "A Needs-Driven, Multi-Objective Approach to Allocate Urban Ecosystem Services from 10,000 Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Roslaili Abdul Aziz & Mok Yiwen & Mawaddah Saleh & Mohd Nazry Salleh & Subash C. B. Gopinath & Sunny Goh Eng Giap & Suresh V. Chinni & Ramachawolran Gobinath, 2023. "Bioaccumulation and Translocation of Heavy Metals in Paddy ( Oryza sativa L.) and Soil in Different Land Use Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Eric Tate & Md Asif Rahman & Christopher T. Emrich & Christopher C. Sampson, 2021. "Flood exposure and social vulnerability in the United States," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 435-457, March.
    13. Matthew C. Harwell & Chloe A. Jackson, 2021. "Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA’s Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community and Sustainability Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    14. John B. Vogler & Jelena Vukomanovic, 2021. "Trends in United States Human Footprint Revealed by New Spatial Metrics of Urbanization and Per Capita Land Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Campbell, Elliott & Marks, Rachel & Conn, Christine, 2020. "Spatial modeling of the biophysical and economic values of ecosystem services in Maryland, USA," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    16. Yongxia Meng & Peng Li & Lie Xiao & Rui Wang & Shutong Yang & Jiangxue Han & Bingze Hu, 2022. "Heavy Metal Content and Pollution Assessment in Typical Check Dam Sediment in a Watershed of Loess Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Vesna Radovanovic & Ilija Djekic & Branka Zarkovic, 2020. "Characteristics of Cadmium and Lead Accumulation and Transfer by Chenopodium Quinoa Will," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    18. Abdullah Addas & Ahmad Maghrabi, 2020. "A Proposed Planning Concept for Public Open Space Provision in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Three Saudi Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-36, August.
    19. van den Belt, Marjan & Stevens, Sharon M., 2016. "Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 60-72.
    20. Despina-Maria Bordean & Luminita Pirvulescu & Mariana-Atena Poiana & Ersilia Alexa & Antoanela Cozma & Diana Nicoleta Raba & Aurica Breica Borozan & Corina Dana Misca & Adriana Morar & Diana Obistioiu, 2021. "An Innovative Approach to Assess the Ecotoxicological Risks of Soil Exposed to Solid Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4094-:d:181339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.