IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p3960-d179371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of 3D Printing and Industry 4.0 into Engineering Teaching

Author

Listed:
  • Siewhui Chong

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500 Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Guan-Ting Pan

    (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, 1 Zhongxiao E. Rd. Sec. 3, Da’an District, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Jitkai Chin

    (School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Pau Loke Show

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500 Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Thomas Chung Kuang Yang

    (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, 1 Zhongxiao E. Rd. Sec. 3, Da’an District, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Chao-Ming Huang

    (Department of Materials Engineering, Kun Shan University, 195 Kunda Road, Yongkang District, Tainan City 710, Taiwan)

Abstract

The rapid emergence of Industry 4.0 implies that our engineering graduates need to acquire new competences to adapt to the digital transformation. This paper evaluates the benefits of integrating 3D printing and Industry 4.0 into engineering undergraduate programs. Surveys were conducted to gather the feedbacks and views from academics and students. 75% and 86% of the participating students and lecturers, respectively, have heard about Industry 4.0. 63% of the students were exposed to modules with such elements. Tangible 3D-printed models enable visualization of fundamental theories and concepts. Enhanced 3D drawing skills and rapid 3D-printed prototypes can greatly help students study common processing equipment, manufacturing, maintenance, logistics, and operations. Some limitations were identified such as budgeting, lack of knowledge, and difficulty in changing from traditional pedagogy. This paper thus proposes a blended learning model for integrating Industry 4.0 into engineering teaching, which consists of traditional, online learning, and flipped classroom approaches. Implementation of the model can be started off with cross-multidisciplinary collaborations or expert-led training for the instructors, followed by traditional face-to-face teaching and online learning. Flipped classroom is one of the essential components of the model which encourages learning-by-making approaches such as ‘bring your own device’ and ‘do it yourself’. Integrating Industry 4.0 into engineering teaching can create a student-based learning environment, where students are gradually trained to become proactive and lifelong learners who are more conscious of the environment and economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Siewhui Chong & Guan-Ting Pan & Jitkai Chin & Pau Loke Show & Thomas Chung Kuang Yang & Chao-Ming Huang, 2018. "Integration of 3D Printing and Industry 4.0 into Engineering Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3960-:d:179371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Yin-Hwa Lu, 2018. "A Framework of Production Planning and Control with Carbon Tax under Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenzhu Liao & Tong Wang, 2019. "A Novel Collaborative Optimization Model for Job Shop Production–Delivery Considering Time Window and Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Luma AL-QUDAH, 2021. "The Perception Of Implementing Industry 4.0 On Supply Chain: A Review On Sustainability Pillars," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 57-69, July.
    3. Andreas Felsberger & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Sustainable Industry 4.0 in Production and Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-39, September.
    4. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Li, Xiaowei & Hua, Guowei & Huang, Anqiang & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Cheng, T.C.E. & Huang, Fengquan, 2020. "Storage assignment policy with awareness of energy consumption in the Kiva mobile fulfilment system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Anupama Prashar, 2023. "Title: production planning and control in industry 4.0 environment: a morphological analysis of literature and research agenda," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 2513-2528, August.
    7. Vasja Roblek & Oshane Thorpe & Mirjana Pejic Bach & Andrej Jerman & Maja Meško, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab, 2022. "Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    9. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shu-Hui Lan & Cheng-Tsu Huang, 2019. "Activity-Based Standard Costing Product-Mix Decision in the Future Digital Era: Green Recycling Steel-Scrap Material for Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, February.
    10. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Cecilia & Aquilani, Barbara & Silvestri, Luca, 2022. "Is this a new story of the ‘Two Giants’? A systematic literature review of the relationship between industry 4.0, sustainability and its pillars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Héctor Cañas & Josefa Mula & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín, 2020. "A General Outline of a Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Mariani, Marcello & Borghi, Matteo, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Krzysztof Ejsmont & Bartlomiej Gladysz & Aldona Kluczek, 2020. "Impact of Industry 4.0 on Sustainability—Bibliometric Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    14. Jaroslav Vrchota & Martin Pech & Ladislav Rolínek & Jiří Bednář, 2020. "Sustainability Outcomes of Green Processes in Relation to Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing: Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-47, July.
    15. Lulu Xin & Shuai Lang & Arunodaya Raj Mishra, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluate the challenges of sustainable supply chain 4.0 implementation under the circular economy concept using new decision making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 773-792, December.
    16. Xiao Zhao & Xuhui Xia & Lei Wang & Guodong Yu, 2018. "Risk-Averse Facility Location for Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks Design under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3960-:d:179371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.