IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v6y2023i2p31-505d1120512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model Selection with Missing Data Embedded in Missing-at-Random Data

Author

Listed:
  • Keiji Takai

    (Faculty of Commerce, Kansai University, Yamatecho 3-3-35, Osaka 564-8680, Japan)

  • Kenichi Hayashi

    (Department of Mathematics, Keio University, Hiyoshi 3-14-1, Kohokuku, Yokohama 223-0061, Japan)

Abstract

When models are built with missing data, an information criterion is needed to select the best model among the various candidates. Using a conventional information criterion for missing data may lead to the selection of the wrong model when data are not missing at random. Conventional information criteria implicitly assume that any subset of missing-at-random data is also missing at random, and thus the maximum likelihood estimator is assumed to be consistent; that is, it is assumed that the estimator will converge to the true value. However, this assumption may not be practical. In this paper, we develop an information criterion that works even for not-missing-at-random data, so long as the largest missing data set is missing at random. Simulations are performed to show the superiority of the proposed information criterion over conventional criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Keiji Takai & Kenichi Hayashi, 2023. "Model Selection with Missing Data Embedded in Missing-at-Random Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2023:i:2:p:31-505:d:1120512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/2/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/2/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ibrahim, Joseph G. & Zhu, Hongtu & Tang, Niansheng, 2008. "Model Selection Criteria for Missing-Data Problems Using the EM Algorithm," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pages 1648-1658.
    2. Ran Tao & Donglin Zeng & Dan-Yu Lin, 2020. "Optimal Designs of Two-Phase Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(532), pages 1946-1959, December.
    3. Gerda Claeskens & Fabrizio Consentino, 2008. "Variable Selection with Incomplete Covariate Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1062-1069, December.
    4. Chang, Wan-Ying & Richards, Donald St. P., 2010. "Finite-sample inference with monotone incomplete multivariate normal data, II," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 603-620, March.
    5. Chang, Wan-Ying & Richards, Donald St.P., 2009. "Finite-sample inference with monotone incomplete multivariate normal data, I," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1883-1899, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsukada, Shin-ichi, 2014. "Asymptotic expansion for distribution of the trace of a covariance matrix under a two-step monotone incomplete sample," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 206-219.
    2. Zhongqi Liang & Qihua Wang & Yuting Wei, 2022. "Robust model selection with covariables missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(3), pages 539-557, June.
    3. Joseph G. Ibrahim & Hongtu Zhu & Ramon I. Garcia & Ruixin Guo, 2011. "Fixed and Random Effects Selection in Mixed Effects Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 495-503, June.
    4. Dirick, Lore & Claeskens, Gerda & Baesens, Bart, 2015. "An Akaike information criterion for multiple event mixture cure models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 449-457.
    5. Richards, Donald St. P. & Yamada, Tomoya, 2010. "The Stein phenomenon for monotone incomplete multivariate normal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 657-678, March.
    6. Tsukada, Shin-ichi, 2014. "Equivalence testing of mean vector and covariance matrix for multi-populations under a two-step monotone incomplete sample," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 183-196.
    7. Tomoya Yamada & Megan Romer & Donald Richards, 2015. "Kurtosis tests for multivariate normality with monotone incomplete data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(3), pages 532-557, September.
    8. Jiming Jiang & Thuan Nguyen & J. Sunil Rao, 2015. "The E-MS Algorithm: Model Selection With Incomplete Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1136-1147, September.
    9. Romer, Megan M. & Richards, Donald St. P., 2010. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal population with monotone incomplete data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(17-18), pages 1284-1288, September.
    10. Joseph Ibrahim & Geert Molenberghs, 2009. "Rejoinder on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: a review," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(1), pages 68-75, May.
    11. Adriano Zanin Zambom & Gregory J. Matthews, 2021. "Sure independence screening in the presence of missing data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 817-845, April.
    12. Krishnamoorthy, K., 2013. "Comparison of confidence intervals for correlation coefficients based on incomplete monotone samples and those based on listwise deletion," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 378-388.
    13. Xia, Ye-Mao & Tang, Nian-Sheng & Gou, Jian-Wei, 2016. "Generalized linear latent models for multivariate longitudinal measurements mixed with hidden Markov models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 259-275.
    14. Ramon I. Garcia & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Hongtu Zhu, 2010. "Variable Selection in the Cox Regression Model with Covariates Missing at Random," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 97-104, March.
    15. Jiang, Wei & Josse, Julie & Lavielle, Marc, 2020. "Logistic regression with missing covariates—Parameter estimation, model selection and prediction within a joint-modeling framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Mitra Robin & Dunson David, 2010. "Two-Level Stochastic Search Variable Selection in GLMs with Missing Predictors," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-40, October.
    17. Brady Ryan & Ananthika Nirmalkanna & Candemir Cigsar & Yildiz E. Yilmaz, 2023. "Evaluation of Designs and Estimation Methods Under Response-Dependent Two-Phase Sampling for Genetic Association Studies," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 510-539, July.
    18. Yong Li & Zeng Tao & Jun Yu, "undated". "Robust Deviance Information Criterion for Latent Variable Models," Working Papers CoFie-04-2012, Singapore Management University, Sim Kee Boon Institute for Financial Economics.
    19. Wei, Yuting & Wang, Qihua & Duan, Xiaogang & Qin, Jing, 2021. "Bias-corrected Kullback–Leibler distance criterion based model selection with covariables missing at random," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Tang, Niansheng & Xia, Linli & Yan, Xiaodong, 2019. "Feature screening in ultrahigh-dimensional partially linear models with missing responses at random," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 208-227.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2023:i:2:p:31-505:d:1120512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.