IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v9y2019i3p62-d262660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emotional Risks of Turning Stories into Data: An Exploration of the Experiences of Qualitative Researchers Working on Sensitive Topics

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Mallon

    (Health and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK)

  • Iris Elliott

    (Head of Policy & Research, Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, D07 CR20 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

A great deal of research has been undertaken into areas involving sensitive topics. In spite of longstanding acceptance that such research can be emotionally risky for participants, interest in the impact of this work on the researcher has only relatively recently become a topic of concern. This paper reports on a roundtable convened with qualitative researchers working in sensitive research areas. The article explores their views in relation to the emotional risks they encountered in relation to their work. A grounded theory, thematic analysis was used to analyse the data and comparisons are made between researcher experiences and those highlighted by earlier studies. We illuminate how researchers described personal concerns about the emotional risks, before focusing on how the researcher’s sense of professionalism contributed to, or protected against, these emotional risks and emotions. This paper also discusses the faltering nature of the support provided to these researchers and the challenges created by the need they felt to create impactful research. The authors conclude by arguing that current support and guidance provided to researchers working in sensitive areas fails to address the complexity of the emotional reaction of the researcher. We call for the development of specialised training and improved use of theoretical concepts such as emotion work, to guide those undertaking this challenging work.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Mallon & Iris Elliott, 2019. "The Emotional Risks of Turning Stories into Data: An Exploration of the Experiences of Qualitative Researchers Working on Sensitive Topics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:62-:d:262660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/9/3/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/9/3/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Namakau Kakanda–Sinkala, 2022. "Distress Protocol for a PhD study exploring the Implementation of the Pregnancy Re-entry Policy among Stakeholders at Primary school level in Chongwe District, Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 680-682, October.
    2. Janna Klostermann & Laura Funk & Holly Symonds-Brown & Maria Cherba & Christine Ceci & Pat Armstrong & Jeanette Pols, 2022. "The Problems with Care: A Feminist Care Scholar Retrospective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Natalie Tyldesley-Marshall & Sheila Greenfield & Susan J. Neilson & Jenny Adamski & Sharon Beardsmore & Martin English & Andrew Peet, 2020. "Exploring the Role of ‘Shadowing’ as a Beneficial Preparatory Step for Sensitive Qualitative Research with Children and Young People with Serious Health Conditions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Kate Reed & Laura Towers, 2023. "Almost Confessional: Managing Emotions When Research Breaks Your Heart," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 28(1), pages 261-278, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:62-:d:262660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.