IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i9p244-d1740659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Capital, Workplace Stress, and Mobbing in the Context of Workers’ Mental Health

Author

Listed:
  • Judit Glavanits

    (Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

  • Kitti Hengl

    (Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

  • Anikó Benyák

    (Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

This study examines how employees’ psychological capital relates to workplace stress and mobbing (also known as workplace bullying) across three European countries. Stress has become an increasingly dominant issue globally since the second half of the 20th century, moving from clinical contexts into public awareness. It is now recognized as a significant health risk factor, particularly in work environments. While positive forms of stress (eustress) can enhance performance, chronic workplace stress is linked to serious mental and physical health problems. This study investigates the relationship between psychological capital (PsyCap), workplace stress, and mobbing among employees in Germany, Austria, and Hungary. Based on a cross-sectional survey (N = 89), the research applied validated instruments (PCQ, PSS-10, COPSOQ II) to measure PsyCap, perceived workplace stress, and experiences of mobbing. Results show a high average PsyCap level (M = 4.64, SD = 0.70) and a moderate perceived workplace stress level (M = 2.73, SD = 0.62) across the sample. A strong negative correlation was identified between PsyCap and workplace stress (r = −0.573, p < 0.001), while a moderate positive correlation was found between workplace stress and mobbing experiences (r = 0.323, p = 0.002). Although PsyCap moderated stress levels, it did not significantly moderate the relationship between mobbing and perceived stress. These findings emphasize the role of PsyCap in reducing workplace stress and underline the necessity of organizational interventions in promoting psychological resilience and mobbing prevention. The results also indicate a need to further examine the causal relationship between mobbing, stress, and PsyCap.

Suggested Citation

  • Judit Glavanits & Kitti Hengl & Anikó Benyák, 2025. "Psychological Capital, Workplace Stress, and Mobbing in the Context of Workers’ Mental Health," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:244-:d:1740659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/9/244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/9/244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakub Michulek & Lubica Gajanova & Lucia Sujanska & Eva Nahalkova Tesarova, 2024. "Understanding How Workplace Dynamics Affect the Psychological Well-Being of University Teachers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:244-:d:1740659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.