IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i7p171-d1683502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Reflexivity in Research with (Migrant) Children: Dealing with Power Asymmetries to Build up More Participatory Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Carolina Ramos

    (Department of Education, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland)

  • Catrin Heite

    (Institute of Education, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Andrea Riepl

    (Institute of Education, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Luisa Weissberg

    (Institute of Education, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Nina Bingham

    (Institute of Education, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Yara Küng

    (Department of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Alexandra Roggensinger

    (Institute of Education, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Julia Steiner

    (Institute of Education, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Participatory research with children presents a range of ethical challenges, particularly concerning power dynamics between adults and children in the research process. Factors such as the research setting, parental consent, the role of gatekeepers, interview dynamics, and the methods used can either facilitate or limit children’s participation. For migrant children and their families, specific issues like the language of communication, the materials developed for the study, socio-economic status, and migration-related vulnerabilities, such as sensitive experiences of (forced) migration, are especially important. This paper explores these ethical considerations through the lens of our research in the WoKidS project, which examines the subjective well-being of children (N = 84) aged 8 to 14, both with and without a migration background. The article is grounded in an ethical reflexivity approach, where multiple researchers involved in the study reflect on their experiences and practices while conducting research with (migrant) children.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Carolina Ramos & Catrin Heite & Andrea Riepl & Luisa Weissberg & Nina Bingham & Yara Küng & Alexandra Roggensinger & Julia Steiner, 2025. "Ethical Reflexivity in Research with (Migrant) Children: Dealing with Power Asymmetries to Build up More Participatory Approaches," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:171-:d:1683502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/7/171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/7/171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:171-:d:1683502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.