IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i4p85-d1621614.html

Representativeness in Employment Relations and in Sociological Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Kerckhofs

    (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, D18 KP65 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Jef C. Verhoeven

    (Department of Sociology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

In the democratic structure of the EU (European Union) the representation of employers and employees is seen as an important element for the development of the economy. It is not sufficient to have a representation of these groups, but the representation of these groups is also expected to be representative. Representativeness is often seen as an equal proportional distribution of the representatives of different groups that have to be represented. Nevertheless, representativeness can also be differently approached. In this article, we examine whether sociological paradigms can help us to get a more nuanced picture of representativeness in employment relations. For this purpose, we present in paradigms developed by Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, Robert K. Merton, Talcott Parsons, and Jürgen Habermas and the exchange theory and symbolic interactionism. Subsequently, we apply these principles on some employment relations in the EU. And we finish with a discussion and conclusion, in which we support the use of a richer concept of representativeness as it is shown in some sociological paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Kerckhofs & Jef C. Verhoeven, 2025. "Representativeness in Employment Relations and in Sociological Theories," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:85-:d:1621614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/4/85/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/4/85/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore Koutroukis & Dimos Chatzinikolaou & Charis Vlados & Victoria Pistikou, 2022. "The Post-COVID-19 Era, Fourth Industrial Revolution, and New Globalization: Restructured Labor Relations and Organizational Adaptation," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimos Chatzinikolaou & Charis Michael Vlados, 2024. "New Globalization and Energy Transition: Insights from Recent Global Developments," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Dimos Chatzinikolaou & Nefeli-Maria Magaliou & Charis Michael Vlados, 2025. "Strategic Human Resource Management, Innovation, and Social Dialogue in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of Greek Pharmaceutical Multinationals," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Charis Michael Vlados, 2024. "The Current Evolution of International Political Economy: Exploring the New Theoretical Divide between New Globalization and Anti-Globalization," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Varvara (Berry) Lalioti, 2025. "A Qualitative Approach to Self-Employment and Social Protection: The Greek Case Within a Transforming World of Work and an Emerging Policy Paradigm," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Athanasia Panagiotidou & Chryssoula Chatzigeorgiou & Evangelos Christou & Ioannis Roussakis, 2025. "Human Resource Management in Industry 4.0 Era: The Influence of Resilience and Self-Efficacy on the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Formative Assessment: A Study of Public Primary Educational Organizations," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Vitaly Kaftan & Wadim Kandalov & Igor Molodtsov & Anna Sherstobitova & Wadim Strielkowski, 2023. "Socio-Economic Stability and Sustainable Development in the Post-COVID Era: Lessons for the Business and Economic Leaders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:85-:d:1621614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.