IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i12p248-d1292274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reluctant Republic: A Positive Right for Older People to Refuse AI-Based Technology

Author

Listed:
  • George Tudorie

    (Department of Communication Studies, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 012244 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Societies in the global North face a future of accelerated ageing. In this context, advanced technology, especially that involving artificial intelligence (AI), is often presented as a natural counterweight to stagnation and decay. While it is a reasonable expectation that AI will play important roles in such societies, the manner in which it affects the lives of older people needs to be discussed. Here I argue that older people should be able to exercise, if they so choose, a right to refuse AI-based technologies, and that this right cannot be purely negative. There is a public duty to provide minimal conditions to exercise such a right, even if majorities in the relevant societies disagree with skeptical attitudes towards technology. It is crucial to recognize that there is nothing inherently irrational or particularly selfish in refusing to embrace technologies that are commonly considered disruptive and opaque, especially when the refusers have much to lose. Some older individuals may understandably decide that they indeed stand to lose a whole world of familiar facts and experiences, competencies built in decades of effort, and autonomy in relation to technology. The current default of investigating older people’s resistance to technology as driven by fear or exaggerated emotion in general, and therefore as something to be managed and extinguished, is untenable.

Suggested Citation

  • George Tudorie, 2023. "Reluctant Republic: A Positive Right for Older People to Refuse AI-Based Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:248-:d:1292274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/12/248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/12/248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:248-:d:1292274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.