IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i3p88-d605840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Idea of the ‘Vulnerable Student’ to Assess the Implications for Academic Freedom

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Waiton

    (School of Business, Law and Social Science, Sociology Division, Abertay University, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK)

Abstract

This paper analyses the concept of vulnerability as it is applied to university students, and also staff, to assess the extent to which it has become a new norm that transforms the understanding of the individual—from being more robust, towards a more fragile sense of personhood. We examine the changing use of the term ‘vulnerable’ over time and with reference to the institutionalisation of the ‘vulnerable subject’. The paper relates this to the theoretical discussion about postmodernism and the ‘end of truth’ within academia, with the subsequent emergence of safe spaces as a mechanism for protecting the vulnerable student. Using snowball sampling, a pilot ethnographic study of academics who have experienced, or claim to have experienced, limits on their academic freedom is developed. One conclusion is that limits to academic freedom stem from within the academy itself. This conclusion is related to the growing understanding that student ‘wellbeing’ necessitates the regulation and ‘policing’ of knowledge and ideas that are deemed to be offensive to the vulnerable student.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Waiton, 2021. "Examining the Idea of the ‘Vulnerable Student’ to Assess the Implications for Academic Freedom," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:88-:d:605840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/88/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/88/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuart Waiton, 2019. "The Vulnerable Subject," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:88-:d:605840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.