IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i11p228-d181698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Away from Politics? Trajectories of Italian Third Sector after the 2008 Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Sandro Busso

    (Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Lungodora Siena 100/A, 10153 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

In modern democracies, nonprofit organizations and social enterprises have a relevant political role that may be threatened by the entry into the market of services. This risk increases in time of economic crisis, when the competition grows stronger and the economic needs become more urgent. Starting from this assumption, the article analyzes the relationship between the managerial strategies and the political role of the Italian third sector, focusing on the implications of the management models put in place in order to “survive” the 2008 economic crisis. Two ideal-typical strategies will be outlined, labelled respectively “entrepreneurial turn” and “hyper-embeddedness”, which seem to have effects both in terms of the manner in which the political role is realized, and in terms of the degree of politicization of the organizations. Since such strategies can both increase or decrease nonprofits’ political ambitions, it is not possible to give an interpretation in terms of a tout court distancing from politics. However, it will be argued that a trait common to all the trajectories is the withdrawal from what Mouffe defines “the political”, referring specifically to the dimension of conflict and antagonism.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandro Busso, 2018. "Away from Politics? Trajectories of Italian Third Sector after the 2008 Crisis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:11:p:228-:d:181698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hendrik Wagenaar & Patsy Healey & Giovanni Laino & Patsy Healey & Geoff Vigar & Sebastià Riutort Isern & Thomas Honeck & Joost Beunderman & Jurgen van der Heijden & Hendrik Wagenaar, 2015. "The transformative potential of civic enterprise," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 557-585, October.
    2. Carlo Borzaga & Sara Depedri & Ermanno Tortia, 2009. "The role of cooperative and social enterprises: A multifaceted approach for an economic pluralism," Euricse Working Papers 0900, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    3. Carlo Borzaga & Simone Poledrini & Giulia Galera, 2017. "Social Enterprise in Italy: Typology, Diffusion and Characteristics," Euricse Working Papers 1796, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    4. Patsy Healey, 2015. "Civil society enterprise and local development," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 11-27, March.
    5. Alberto Ianes, 2016. "Exploring the Origins of Social Enterprise: Social Co-operation in the Italian Welfare System and its Reproduction in Europe (from the 1970s to the Present)," Euricse Working Papers 1688, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    6. Jonathan S. Davies, 2007. "The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 779-800, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Davies, 2014. "Rethinking urban power and the local state: Hegemony, domination and resistance in neoliberal cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3215-3232, November.
    2. Hiska Ubels & Bettina Bock & Tialda Haartsen, 2019. "An evolutionary perspective on experimental local governance arrangements with local governments and residents in Dutch rural areas of depopulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(7), pages 1277-1295, November.
    3. Silvia Sacchetti & Ermanno Tortia, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    4. Andrzej Zieleniec, 2018. "Lefebvre’s Politics of Space: Planning the Urban as Oeuvre," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 5-15.
    5. Jonathan S. Davies & Madeleine Pill, 2012. "Hollowing Out Neighbourhood Governance? Rescaling Revitalisation in Baltimore and Bristol," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(10), pages 2199-2217, August.
    6. Wim Bosschaart & Noelle Aarts & Riyan J.G. van den Born, 2020. "Towards a Sustainable Landscape: Constructing Identities and Ambitions in a Citizen Initiative in the Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Jonathan S Davies, 2012. "Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
    8. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    9. Gianluca Salvatori, 2013. "Econom a cooperativa: un enfoque innovador para la sostenibilidad," Euricse Working Papers 1349, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    10. Raluca-Ana-Maria DUMITRU, 2013. "Social Economy - A Solution To The Labor Market Inclusion," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 22(1), pages 53-60.
    11. Buijs, Arjen & Kamphorst, Dana & Mattijssen, Thomas & van Dam, Rosalie & Kuindersma, Wiebren & Bouwma, Irene, 2022. "Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Iwaisi, Mazen, 2025. "Who owns the past? Archaeological sites and the question of land ownership in Palestine," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Andrzej Zieleniec, 2018. "Lefebvre’s Politics of Space: Planning the Urban as Oeuvre," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 5-15.
    14. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    15. Francesco Gerli & Veronica Chiodo & Irene Bengo, 2020. "Technology Transfer for Social Entrepreneurship: Designing Problem-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Michael Buser, 2014. "Democratic Accountability and Metropolitan Governance: The Case of South Hampshire, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2336-2353, August.
    17. Andrea Signoretti & Silvia Sacchetti, 2020. "Lean HRM practices in work integration social enterprises: Moving towards social lean production. Evidence from Italian case studies," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(4), pages 545-563, December.
    18. Jonathan S Davies & André Spicer, 2015. "Interrogating Networks: Towards an Agnostic Perspective on Governance Research," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 223-238, April.
    19. Anita Kokx & Ronald van Kempen, 2009. "Joining Forces in Urban Restructuring: Dealing with Collaborative Ideals and Role Conflicts in Breda, the Netherlands," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1234-1250, May.
    20. Carlo Borzaga & Riccardo Bodini, 2012. "What to make of social innovation? Towards a framework for policy development," Euricse Working Papers 1236, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:11:p:228-:d:181698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.