IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v3y2014i3p326-340d38505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism

Author

Listed:
  • Celia H. Brackenridge

    (Centre for Sport, Health and Well-being, Heinz Wolff Building, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Daniel Rhind

    (Centre for Sport, Health and Well-being, Heinz Wolff Building, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

Abstract

This paper examines the responses of state and third sector agencies to the emergence of child abuse in sport since the mid-1980s. As with other social institutions such as the church, health and education, sport has both initiated its own child protection interventions and also responded to wider social and political influences. Sport has exemplified many of the changes identified in the brief for this special issue, such as the widening of definitional focus, increasing geographic scope and broadening of concerns to encompass health and welfare. The child protection agenda in sport was initially driven by sexual abuse scandals and has since embraced a range of additional harms to children, such as physical and psychological abuse, neglect and damaging hazing (initiation) rituals. Whereas in the 1990s, only a few sport organisations acknowledged or addressed child abuse and protection (notably, UK, Canada and Australia), there has since been rapid growth in interest in the issue internationally, with many agencies now taking an active role in prevention work. These agencies adopt different foci related to their overall mission and may be characterised broadly as sport-specific (focussing on abuse prevention in sport), children’s rights organisations (focussing on child protection around sport events) and humanitarian organisations (focussing on child development and protection through sport). This article examines how these differences in organisational focus lead to very different child protection approaches and “solutions”. It critiques the scientific approaches used thus far to inform activism and policy changes and ends by considering future challenges for athlete safeguarding and welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Celia H. Brackenridge & Daniel Rhind, 2014. "Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:326-340:d:38505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/3/326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/3/326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Åse Strandbu & Gerd Marie Solstad & Kari Stefansen & Morten Renslo Sandvik, 2022. "Sexual Harassment or Just Coaching? Sport Students Making Sense of Possibly Sexualising Coach Behaviours," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Amy Lorraine Wilson & Daniel J. A. Rhind, 2022. "Tracking Progress towards the International Safeguards for Children in Sport," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Ellen MacPherson & Anthony Battaglia & Gretchen Kerr & Sophie Wensel & Sarah McGee & Aalaya Milne & Francesca Principe & Erin Willson, 2022. "Evaluation of Publicly Accessible Child Protection in Sport Education and Reporting Initiatives," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Roberts, Victoria & Sojo, Victor & Grant, Felix, 2020. "Organisational factors and non-accidental violence in sport: A systematic review," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 8-27.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:326-340:d:38505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.