IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i4p221-d1625945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding a Parent’s Visitation Capacity After a Care Order

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Gerdts-Andresen

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway)

  • Anette Ødegård Eriksen

    (Child Welfare Service, Municipality of Drammen, 3008 Drammen, Norway)

Abstract

The ability of parents to maintain visitation with their child after a care order is a complex aspect of child welfare. While visitation is widely recognized as essential for preserving family bonds and supporting potential reunification, less attention has been given to how broader life circumstances influence a parent’s ability to engage in visitation. This study explores how parents describe their life situation after a care order and examines how different contextual factors may relate to their visitation capacity. The study employs thematic analysis based on interviews with 31 parents whose children were placed in public care. The findings reveal that parents face multiple barriers that affect their ability to sustain meaningful contact with their child, including emotional and psychological strain, social isolation and stigma, trust and cooperation challenges, and shifting parent–child relationship dynamics. Many parents described profound distress following the care order, marked by anxiety, grief, and loss of parental identity. Additionally, strained relationships with child welfare professionals, inconsistent expectations, and systemic barriers further complicate their efforts to remain engaged. These findings highlight that visitation capacity is not merely a matter of legal access but is shaped by broader life circumstances, emotional resilience, and institutional support structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Gerdts-Andresen & Anette Ødegård Eriksen, 2025. "Understanding a Parent’s Visitation Capacity After a Care Order," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:221-:d:1625945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenny, Kathleen S. & Barrington, Clare, 2018. "“People just don't look at you the same way”: Public stigma, private suffering and unmet social support needs among mothers who use drugs in the aftermath of child removal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 209-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Healy, Karen & Venables, Jemma & Walsh, Tamara, 2023. "Supporting birth parents’ relationships with children following removal: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Burrow, Samantha & Wood, Lisa & Fisher, Colleen & Usher, Renée & Gayde, Renna & O’Donnell, Melissa, 2024. "Parents’ experiences of perinatal child protection processes: A systematic review and thematic synthesis informed by a socio-ecological approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Rapsey, C.M. & Rolston, Cassandra J., 2020. "Fostering the family, not just the child: Exploring the value of a residential family preservation programme from the perspectives of service users and staff," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:221-:d:1625945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.