IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i10p563-d1256042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unpacking Gender for Flat Breast Cancer Survivors Assigned Female at Birth: A Methodological Application of Visually Informed, Critical Discursive Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Trisha L. Raque

    (Department of Counseling Psychology, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA)

  • Keiko M. McCullough

    (Department of Counseling Psychology, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA)

  • Maggie A. Creegan

    (Department of Counseling Psychology, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA)

Abstract

Given the high prevalence rates of breast cancer and mastectomy as recommended treatment, a large number of breast cancer survivors assigned female at birth may face contradicting messages about whether to pursue reconstruction. Survivors desire information outside of standard biased pro-reconstruction messages, with an increase in utilization of online social platforms to learn of the lived experiences of survivors who have gone flat. As breasts are socially constructed symbols connected to femininity, fertility, motherhood, and (hetereo)sexualization, the application of visually informed, critical discursive psychology holds promise as a method for analyzing how survivors “do” gender after going flat. This paper summarizes prior research on messages around reconstruction before diving into how breasts hold sociocultural meanings in relation to gender performance. A preliminary reading of a photo posted on Twitter by Tig Notaro, a comedian who has been public about breast cancer, and a photo posted on Instagram by entrepreneur Jamie Kastelic were analyzed using a visually informed, critical discursive psychology lens. Our preliminary analysis illustrates the utility of this method for understanding how flat survivors assigned female at birth construct gender for both themselves and a social media audience. This paper challenges assumptions regarding what a “healthy” breast cancer survivor looks like and aims to encourage future inquiries into how social media functions as a space where survivors can perform gender online after going flat themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Trisha L. Raque & Keiko M. McCullough & Maggie A. Creegan, 2023. "Unpacking Gender for Flat Breast Cancer Survivors Assigned Female at Birth: A Methodological Application of Visually Informed, Critical Discursive Psychology," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:563-:d:1256042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/10/563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/10/563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sledge, Piper, 2019. "From decision to incision: Ideologies of gender in surgical cancer care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MacKinnon, K.R. & Ashley, F. & Kia, H. & Lam, J.S.H. & Krakowsky, Y. & Ross, L.E., 2021. "Preventing transition “regret”: An institutional ethnography of gender-affirming medical care assessment practices in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:563-:d:1256042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.