IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i10p448-d930493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Mechanisms Used to Improve Community Participation in the Integrated Development Planning Process in South Africa: An Empirical Review

Author

Listed:
  • John Mamokhere

    (School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Daniel Francois Meyer

    (School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

In 1996, the government of South Africa introduced the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) policy process to transform municipal administration, integrated planning and service delivery. One of the IDP policy’s key aspects is community participation in the planning process. South Africa is still struggling to achieve their duty of delivering basic services due to ineffective community participation. The article primarily appraises the mechanisms for improved community participation in the IDP process. It is underpinned by the New Public Management (NPM) theory, which promotes management reforms, participatory planning, and decentralising power among municipalities and communities. This study adopted a mixed-methods research approach. It is conducted in the Tzaneen municipal area in Limpopo Province. It is also found that some of the mechanisms to facilitate community participation are no longer relevant and effective in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Public meetings are no longer seen as an effective and safe means of public discussion due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Disaster Management Act: Amendment of Regulation (Act 57 of 2002) that restricts the physical contact of large groups of people, which has implications for public meeting attendance. The study concludes by recommending that the Tzaneen municipal area should design mechanisms that make it easier for marginalised and previously disadvantaged people to participate in municipal planning and decision-making processes freely and without prejudice. Lastly, the study recommends that the municipality adopt the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) and E-participation to facilitate effective community participation in the IDP process.

Suggested Citation

  • John Mamokhere & Daniel Francois Meyer, 2022. "A Review of Mechanisms Used to Improve Community Participation in the Integrated Development Planning Process in South Africa: An Empirical Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:448-:d:930493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/448/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/448/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Mamokhere & Daniel F Meyer, 2022. "Including the excluded in the integrated development planning process for improved community participation," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 286-299, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juliet Akola & James Chakwizira & Emaculate Ingwani & Peter Bikam, 2023. "Awareness Level of Spatial Planning Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction in Informal Settlements in Mopani District, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Accountability, inclusivity, effectiveness, and leaving no one behind: An exploration of effective governance principles in ensuring clean water and sanitation in South African municipalities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 191-205, December.
    2. John Mamokhere, 2023. "Sending a message to the top: the influence of service delivery protests on service delivery planning in South African municipalities," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(2), pages 60-71, June.
    3. John Mamokhere & France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe, 2023. "Service Delivery Protests In South African Municipalities: Trends, Factors, Impacts And Recommendations," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 10(2), pages 49-59, December.
    4. John Mamokhere & Daniel Francois Meyer, 2023. "Towards an Exploration of the Significance of Community Participation in the Integrated Development Planning Process in South Africa," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, April.
    5. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Pragmatic implementation and promotion of good governance principles in realizing Sustainable Development Goal Six (6) in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(6), pages 20-32, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:448-:d:930493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.