IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i11p429-d673887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian Health Professionals’ Attitudes toward Voluntary Assisted Dying: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Moira O’Connor

    (WA Cancer Prevention Research Unit, School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
    School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Charlene Martin

    (School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Lindy Willmott

    (Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)

  • Darren Haywood

    (WA Cancer Prevention Research Unit, School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
    School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Blake J. Lawrence

    (WA Cancer Prevention Research Unit, School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
    School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Lauren J. Breen

    (School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

Abstract

Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is when a terminally ill person with decision-making capacity consensually ends their life with assistance from an authorised professional. Many countries have legalised VAD, and health professionals’ roles within VAD frameworks are varied. Health professionals must be well informed of their legal obligations to ensure they practice within the legal boundaries, and those professionals with objections toward VAD should ensure that their eligible patients have equitable access. Given the current landscape of VAD, it is important to understand different health professionals’ attitudes toward VAD and what may underpin these attitudes. We explored (a) Australian health professionals’ attitudes toward VAD; (b) the psychological components that underpin those attitudes; (c) health professionals’ level of knowledge about VAD; (d) health professionals’ most common beliefs, emotions, and experiences related to VAD. A cross-sectional correlational survey design was used. A total of 182 Australian health professionals participated in the online survey based on a tripartite model of attitudes. We conducted a binomial logistic regression through a Generalised Linear Mixed Model and found polarised attitudes toward VAD between health professionals. Attitudes were accounted for by beliefs, emotions, education, and strength of religious beliefs. Knowledge of VAD was low, but not associated with overall attitude in our model. We highlight the importance of reflexive practice to help health professionals identify their values and feelings related to VAD, and to understand how these may affect their clinical practice. Low knowledge of VAD suggests that legislative and procedural training should be mandatory.

Suggested Citation

  • Moira O’Connor & Charlene Martin & Lindy Willmott & Darren Haywood & Blake J. Lawrence & Lauren J. Breen, 2021. "Australian Health Professionals’ Attitudes toward Voluntary Assisted Dying: A Cross-Sectional Survey," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:429-:d:673887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/11/429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/11/429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petrillo, L.A. & Dzeng, E. & Harrison, K.L. & Forbes, L. & Scribner, B. & Koenig, B.A., 2017. "How California prepared for implementation of physician-assisted death: A primer," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(6), pages 883-888.
    2. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303755_5 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:429-:d:673887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.