IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i10p386-d655139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does She Deserve It? The Influence of Gender and Meritocracy in Reactions to Affirmative Action Legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Virgínia Silva

    (Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Maria Helena Santos

    (Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
    Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Miriam Rosa

    (Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
    Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Gender equality is a matter for debate worldwide. In 2018, Portugal enacted legislation (Decree Law no. 62/2017) to balance gender representation on the executive boards of listed and public sector organizations with measures similar to those causing controversies in other countries. Thus, in accordance with previous research, a study took place to examine the attitudes towards the justice of this legislation and the role of merit in these attitudes. This study ( n = 129 women and 94 men) deployed an experimentally manipulative type of affirmative action program to consider the role of individual perceptions of the justice of the legislation coupled with the influence of beliefs in meritocracy and participant gender. The results identify how the type of affirmative action impacted on the perceived justice, also influenced by merit, which seems normative and fundamental to evaluating the justice of such legally stipulated provisions. Nonetheless, objectively evaluating candidate merits revealed difficulties in disentangling this process from personality traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Virgínia Silva & Maria Helena Santos & Miriam Rosa, 2021. "Does She Deserve It? The Influence of Gender and Meritocracy in Reactions to Affirmative Action Legislation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:386-:d:655139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:386-:d:655139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.