IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i4p73-d1631150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multistate Analysis of Policyholder Behaviour in Life Insurance—Lasso-Based Modelling Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Reck

    (Institute for Finance and Actuarial Sciences (ifa), 89081 Ulm, Germany
    Institute of Insurance Science, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany)

  • Johannes Schupp

    (Institute for Finance and Actuarial Sciences (ifa), 89081 Ulm, Germany)

  • Andreas Reuß

    (Institute for Finance and Actuarial Sciences (ifa), 89081 Ulm, Germany)

Abstract

Holders of life insurance policies can exercise various options that lead to contract modifications, e.g., full surrender, partial surrender, and paid-up and dynamic premium increase options. Transitions between these contract states materially affect (current and future) cash flows and thus represent a serious source of uncertainty for an insurance company. It is common practice to determine best-estimate assumptions for these transitions independently, i.e., without considering joint determinants of the different aspects of policyholder behaviour. The recent literature also incorporates multistate classical statistical models. Our paper shows how consistent best-estimate transition rates for multiple status transitions can be derived using data science methods. More specifically, we extend existing multivariate approaches based on established statistical models (generalised linear models) with the Lasso method, such that the key drivers for each transition can be identified automatically. We discuss the performance, the complexity and the practical applicability of the different modelling approaches based on data from a European insurer.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Reck & Johannes Schupp & Andreas Reuß, 2025. "A Multistate Analysis of Policyholder Behaviour in Life Insurance—Lasso-Based Modelling Approaches," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:73-:d:1631150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roel Henckaerts & Katrien Antonio & Maxime Clijsters & Roel Verbelen, 2018. "A data driven binning strategy for the construction of insurance tariff classes," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(8), pages 681-705, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarra Ghaddab & Manel Kacem & Christian Peretti & Lotfi Belkacem, 2023. "Extreme severity modeling using a GLM-GPD combination: application to an excess of loss reinsurance treaty," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1105-1127, September.
    2. Jaiswal, Rachana & Gupta, Shashank & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2024. "Big data and machine learning-based decision support system to reshape the vaticination of insurance claims," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Freek Holvoet & Katrien Antonio & Roel Henckaerts, 2023. "Neural networks for insurance pricing with frequency and severity data: a benchmark study from data preprocessing to technical tariff," Papers 2310.12671, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    4. Zhang, Yaojun & Ji, Lanpeng & Aivaliotis, Georgios & Taylor, Charles, 2024. "Bayesian CART models for insurance claims frequency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 108-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:73-:d:1631150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.