IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i3p37-d1091687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transformed Approach for Benchmarking the Performance of ‘Sustainable’ Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Samantha Hayes

    (Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia)

  • Cheryl Desha

    (Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia)

  • Savindi Caldera

    (Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia)

  • Mark Gibbs

    (School of Architecture & Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia)

Abstract

Environmental sustainability priorities for infrastructure development have traditionally focused on aspects including minimising negative impacts in areas such as water and air quality, erosion control, biodiversity and waste management, both in compliance and voluntary frameworks. Associated project performance priorities have focused on avoiding damage beyond ‘pre-project baselines’. In contrast, ‘best practice’ regenerative performance requires infrastructure project outcomes that not only avoid damage but contribute positively to social and ecological systems. For such best practice to become mainstream, industry frameworks, standards and rating schemes must evolve. However, there is limited knowledge regarding ‘how’ regenerative performance could be encouraged as a business-as-usual infrastructure expectation. This paper therefore explores the potential for a benchmarking methodology called Ecological Performance Standards (EPS) as a transformed approach to facilitate the mainstreaming of regenerative performance expectations. Three research workshops (Phoenix, AZ, USA; Sydney and Brisbane, Australia) were undertaken to investigate the potential for this methodology in infrastructure applications. Mapping was undertaken to align the EPS process steps with associated infrastructure lifecycle phases. Research findings include the synthesis of key opportunities for capturing EPS within infrastructure sustainability rating schemes to leverage current efforts and pivot towards regenerative performance. The authors present a comprehensive matrix mapping 18 ecosystem services against the Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating Scheme credits and categories, summarising where ecosystem services are addressed within the current scheme. The authors conclude the presence of significant opportunities for a new ‘business-as-usual’ for infrastructure through the integration of regenerative performance benchmarking.

Suggested Citation

  • Samantha Hayes & Cheryl Desha & Savindi Caldera & Mark Gibbs, 2023. "A Transformed Approach for Benchmarking the Performance of ‘Sustainable’ Infrastructure," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:37-:d:1091687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/3/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/3/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayes, Samantha & Desha, Cheryl & Baumeister, Dayna, 2020. "Learning from nature – Biomimicry innovation to support infrastructure sustainability and resilience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcia Sierdovski & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Priscila Rubbo, 2022. "Organizational Competencies in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Zhao, Ge & Zhou, P. & Wen, Wen, 2021. "Feed-in tariffs, knowledge stocks and renewable energy technology innovation: The role of local government intervention," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Gregory C. Unruh, 2023. "From Geomimetic to Biomimetic Manufacturing: Digitally Transforming Industry for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Rodríguez, Rosa M. & Labella, Álvaro & Nuñez-Cacho, Pedro & Molina-Moreno, Valentin & Martínez, Luis, 2022. "A comprehensive minimum cost consensus model for large scale group decision making for circular economy measurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Tang, Min & Liu, Peihan & Chao, Xiangrui & Han, Zhenglin, 2021. "The performativity of city resilience for sustainable development of poor and disaster-prone regions: A case study from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:37-:d:1091687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.