IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i11p136-d1280040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent Effects of Topography on Soil Properties and Above-Ground Biomass in Nepal’s Mid-Hill Forests

Author

Listed:
  • Sandhya Nepal

    (Institute of Forestry, Hetauda Campus, Tribhuvan University, Hetauda 44107, Nepal)

  • Mohan KC

    (School of Science and Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand)

  • Nabaraj Pudasaini

    (Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal)

  • Hari Adhikari

    (Earth Change Observation Laboratory, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
    AFRY Management Consulting Oy, Jaakonkatu 3, 01620 Vantaa, Finland)

Abstract

Various factors, including topography, climate, soil attributes, and vegetation composition, influence above-ground biomass productivity in forest ecosystems. Despite the success of community forestry in restoring degraded hill forests in Nepal, existing research offers limited insights into how topographic factors and plant species affect soil chemical properties and, in turn, influence above-ground biomass. This study investigates the interrelations between altitude, aspect, soil depth, and vegetation type on soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (P), available potassium (K), and soil pH. These soil metrics are further correlated with forestry indices, such as diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (Ht), above-ground tree biomass (AGTB), basal area (BA), and above-ground total carbon (AGTC), in the mid-hill region of central Nepal. Our findings indicate that aspect had a significant influence on SOC ( p < 0.001), TN ( p < 0.001), P ( p < 0.05), and pH ( p < 0.001) levels. Soils in the northwest (NW) aspect exhibited higher levels of SOC and TN but lower levels of P and pH than those in the southeast (SE) aspect. Altitude did not significantly affect soil properties. Variations in SOC, TN, K, and pH were observed across different soil depths. Key forestry metrics like DBH, Ht, AGTB, and AGTC were notably higher at elevated altitudes and under the NW aspect. We also found that vegetation composition adds a layer of complexity to the relationship between aspect, soil properties, and above-ground biomass. The higher altitudes in the SE aspect are more conducive to above-ground biomass productivity, while the NW aspect is favorable for higher levels of SOC and TN in the soil. These variations could be due to differences in carbon deposition rates, plant compositions, soil microbial activities, and microclimatic conditions between the aspects. These findings highlight the need for holistic forest management approaches that consider topographic factors, soil depth, and plant species, offering practical implications for the region’s sustainable forest management and restoration efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandhya Nepal & Mohan KC & Nabaraj Pudasaini & Hari Adhikari, 2023. "Divergent Effects of Topography on Soil Properties and Above-Ground Biomass in Nepal’s Mid-Hill Forests," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:136-:d:1280040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/11/136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/11/136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sébastien Fontaine & Sébastien Barot & Pierre Barré & Nadia Bdioui & Bruno Mary & Cornelia Rumpel, 2007. "Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7167), pages 277-280, November.
    2. Sumeet Gairola & C. M. Sharma & S. K. Ghildiyal & Sarvesh Suyal, 2012. "Chemical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of Garhwal Himalaya, India," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 512-523, December.
    3. Xia, Y.Q. & Shao, M.A., 2008. "Soil water carrying capacity for vegetation: A hydrologic and biogeochemical process model solution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 112-124.
    4. George W. Koch & Stephen C. Sillett & Gregory M. Jennings & Stephen D. Davis, 2004. "The limits to tree height," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6985), pages 851-854, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaochang Wu & Huayong Zhang & Zhongyu Wang & Wang Tian & Zhao Liu, 2024. "Patterns of Soil Stoichiometry Driven by Mixed Tree Species Proportions in Boreal Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Virna Estefania Moran-Rodas & Verena Preusse & Christine Wachendorf, 2022. "Agricultural Management Practices and Decision-Making in View of Soil Organic Matter in the Urbanizing Region of Bangalore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Tong-Hui Wu & Yu-Fu Hu & Yan-Yan Zhang & Xiang-Yang Shu & Ze-Peng Yang & Wei Zhou & Cheng-Yi Huang & Jie Li & Zhi Li & Jia He & Ying Yu, 2022. "Changes in soil organic carbon and its fractions under grassland reclamation in alpine-cold soils, China," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 17(4), pages 211-221.
    4. Xiaoyan Ren & Xinyi Zhang & Liqun Cai & Jun Wu, 2025. "Responses of Soil Aggregate Stability and SOC to Different Tillage Modes and Straw Input Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Gao, Lei & Shao, Mingan, 2012. "Temporal stability of shallow soil water content for three adjacent transects on a hillslope," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 41-54.
    6. Aneta Kowalska & Marek Kucbel & Anna Grobelak, 2021. "Potential and Mechanisms for Stable C Storage in the Post-Mining Soils under Long-Term Study in Mitigation of Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Nina L. Friggens & Gustaf Hugelius & Steven V. Kokelj & Julian B. Murton & Gareth K. Phoenix & Iain P. Hartley, 2025. "Positive rhizosphere priming accelerates carbon release from permafrost soils," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Soni Bisht & Surendra Singh Bargali & Kiran Bargali & Gopal Singh Rawat & Yashwant Singh Rawat & Archana Fartyal, 2022. "Influence of Anthropogenic Activities on Forest Carbon Stocks—A Case Study from Gori Valley, Western Himalaya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Shuai Ren & Tao Wang & Bertrand Guenet & Dan Liu & Yingfang Cao & Jinzhi Ding & Pete Smith & Shilong Piao, 2024. "Projected soil carbon loss with warming in constrained Earth system models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Matheus Henrique Nunes & Marcel Caritá Vaz & José Luís Campana Camargo & William F. Laurance & Ana Andrade & Alberto Vicentini & Susan Laurance & Pasi Raumonen & Toby Jackson & Gabriela Zuquim & Jin W, 2023. "Edge effects on tree architecture exacerbate biomass loss of fragmented Amazonian forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Liu, Bingxia & Shao, Ming’an, 2015. "Modeling soil–water dynamics and soil–water carrying capacity for vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 176-184.
    12. Mendup Tamang & Roman Chettri & Vineeta & Gopal Shukla & Jahangeer A. Bhat & Amit Kumar & Munesh Kumar & Arpit Suryawanshi & Marina Cabral-Pinto & Sumit Chakravarty, 2021. "Stand Structure, Biomass and Carbon Storage in Gmelina arborea Plantation at Agricultural Landscape in Foothills of Eastern Himalayas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Zhang, Feng & Zhang, Wenjuan & Li, Ming & Zhang, Yuan & Li, Fengmin & Li, Changbin, 2017. "Is crop biomass and soil carbon storage sustainable with long-term application of full plastic film mulching under future climate change?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 67-77.
    14. Sining Wang & Jie Tang & Zhaoyang Li & Yuqing Liu & Zihao Zhou & Jingjing Wang & Yunke Qu & Zhenxue Dai, 2020. "Carbon Mineralization under Different Saline—Alkali Stress Conditions in Paddy Fields of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Zhang, Yuwen & Ding, Changjun & Liu, Yan & Li, Shan & Li, Ximeng & Xi, Benye & Duan, Jie, 2023. "Xylem anatomical and hydraulic traits vary within crown but not respond to water and nitrogen addition in Populus tomentosa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    16. Tyson L Swetnam & Christopher D O’Connor & Ann M Lynch, 2016. "Tree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Baveye, Philippe C. & Laba, Magdeline, 2015. "Moving away from the geostatistical lamppost: Why, where, and how does the spatial heterogeneity of soils matter?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 298(C), pages 24-38.
    18. Hunt, Allen G. & Faybishenko, Boris & Powell, Thomas L., 2020. "A new phenomenological model to describe root-soil interactions based on percolation theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    19. Mingming Wang & Xiaowei Guo & Shuai Zhang & Liujun Xiao & Umakant Mishra & Yuanhe Yang & Biao Zhu & Guocheng Wang & Xiali Mao & Tian Qian & Tong Jiang & Zhou Shi & Zhongkui Luo, 2022. "Global soil profiles indicate depth-dependent soil carbon losses under a warmer climate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Moustakas, Aristides & Sakkos, Konstantinos & Wiegand, Kerstin & Ward, David & Meyer, Katrin M. & Eisinger, Dirk, 2009. "Are savannas patch-dynamic systems? A landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3576-3588.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:136-:d:1280040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.