IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v8y2020i3p38-d383141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Striving for Modernity: Layout and Abstracts in the Biomedical Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Galli

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

  • Maria Teresa Colangelo

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, Histology and Embryology Lab, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

  • Stefano Guizzardi

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, Histology and Embryology Lab, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

Abstract

Most academic journals have a fairly consistent look: they are structured similarly, their text is divided into similar sections; for example, they have an abstract at the beginning of the manuscript, and their text is usually organized in two columns. There may be different reasons for this similarity, ranging from the need to contain publication costs by using less page space to conforming to an internationally well-accepted format that may be perceived as the hallmark of academic articles. We surveyed 35 medical journals founded before 1960 and looked for their change in format over time and how this was experienced by and explained to readers. We then discussed what recent research has shown about the effects of layout on reading, looking for further explanations as to why this format was so successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Galli & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Stefano Guizzardi, 2020. "Striving for Modernity: Layout and Abstracts in the Biomedical Literature," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:38-:d:383141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/8/3/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/8/3/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlo Galli & Stefano Guizzardi, 2020. "Change in Format, Register and Narration Style in the Biomedical Literature: A 1948 Example," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Esther Landhuis, 2016. "Scientific literature: Information overload," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7612), pages 457-458, July.
    3. Carlo Galli & Roberto Sala & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Stefano Guizzardi, 2019. "Between Innovation and Standardization, Is There Still a Room for Scientific Reports? The Rise of a Formatting Tradition in Periodontal Research," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Guizzardi & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Prisco Mirandola & Carlo Galli, 2023. "The Evolution of Narrativity in Abstracts of the Biomedical Literature between 1989 and 2022," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Guizzardi & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Prisco Mirandola & Carlo Galli, 2023. "The Evolution of Narrativity in Abstracts of the Biomedical Literature between 1989 and 2022," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Carlo Galli & Stefano Guizzardi, 2020. "Change in Format, Register and Narration Style in the Biomedical Literature: A 1948 Example," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Manh-Toan Ho & Ngoc-Thang B. Le & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "A bibliometric review on development economics research in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2939-2969, October.
    4. Andreas Rehs, 2020. "A structural topic model approach to scientific reorientation of economics and chemistry after German reunification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1229-1251, November.
    5. Yue Zhang & Weiyan Wang & Zhiyi Zhang, 2017. "Journals, Please go Further!," Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(5), pages 104-105, July.
    6. Carlo Galli & Roberto Sala & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Stefano Guizzardi, 2022. "Tamquam alter idem: formal similarities in a subset of reports on anti-inflammatory compounds in the years 2008–2019," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3879-3910, July.
    7. Veronika Oravcová & Kateryna Yakovenko & Matúš Mišík, 2022. "Complete but Fragmented: Research on Energy in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," Thesis Commons msy6e, Center for Open Science.
    9. Stefano Guizzardi & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Prisco Mirandola & Carlo Galli, 2024. "Tracing the Evolution of Reviews and Research Articles in the Biomedical Literature: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Abstracts," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Rayanne Barros Setubal & Daniel Silva Farias & Clarice Casa Nova & Anna Carolina Fornero Aguiar & Tauany Aparecida Silva Santa Rosa Rodrigues & Rafael Teixeira Santos Lira & Anderson Luiz Vargas Ferre, 2022. "Microwave effect: analyzing citations from classic theories and their reinventions—a case study from a classic paper in aquatic ecology—Brooks & Dodson, 1965," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4751-4767, August.
    11. Yadav, Pratyush & Pervin, Nargis, 2022. "Towards efficient navigation in digital libraries: Leveraging popularity, semantics and communities to recommend scholarly articles," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    12. Grażyna Wieczorkowska & Katarzyna Kowalczyk, 2021. "Ensuring Sustainable Evaluation: How to Improve Quality of Evaluating Grant Proposals?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
    13. , Aisdl, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," OSF Preprints 9nbyr, Center for Open Science.
    14. Kai Li & Chenyue Jiao, 2022. "The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 834-846, June.
    15. Stefano Mammola & Diego Fontaneto & Alejandro Martínez & Filipe Chichorro, 2021. "Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 785-799, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:38-:d:383141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.