IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v12y2024i1p2-d1318386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracing the Evolution of Reviews and Research Articles in the Biomedical Literature: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Abstracts

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Guizzardi

    (Histology and Embryology Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

  • Maria Teresa Colangelo

    (Histology and Embryology Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

  • Prisco Mirandola

    (Histology and Embryology Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

  • Carlo Galli

    (Histology and Embryology Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43126 Parma, Italy)

Abstract

We previously examined the diachronic shifts in the narrative structure of research articles (RAs) and review manuscripts using abstract corpora from MEDLINE. This study employs Nini’s Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (MAT) on the same datasets to explore five linguistic dimensions (D1–5) in these two sub-genres of biomedical literature, offering insights into evolving writing practices over 30 years. Analyzing a sample exceeding 1.2 million abstracts, we observe a shared reinforcement of an informational, emotionally detached tone (D1) in both RAs and reviews. Additionally, there is a gradual departure from narrative devices (D2), coupled with an increase in context-independent content (D3). Both RAs and reviews maintain low levels of overt persuasion (D4) while shifting focus from abstract content to emphasize author agency and identity. A comparison of linguistic features underlying these dimensions reveals often independent changes in RAs and reviews, with both tending to converge toward standardized stylistic norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Guizzardi & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Prisco Mirandola & Carlo Galli, 2024. "Tracing the Evolution of Reviews and Research Articles in the Biomedical Literature: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Abstracts," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2-:d:1318386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Landhuis, 2016. "Scientific literature: Information overload," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7612), pages 457-458, July.
    2. Stefano Guizzardi & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Prisco Mirandola & Carlo Galli, 2023. "The Evolution of Narrativity in Abstracts of the Biomedical Literature between 1989 and 2022," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Indira R. Mendiola-Pastrana & Eduardo López-Ortiz & Rubí G. Hernández-López & Luisa F. Romero-Henríquez & Rocío Dávila-Mendoza & Geovani López-Ortiz, 2024. "Analysis of Scientific Production in Family Medicine in Mexico," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manh-Toan Ho & Ngoc-Thang B. Le & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "A bibliometric review on development economics research in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2939-2969, October.
    2. Grażyna Wieczorkowska & Katarzyna Kowalczyk, 2021. "Ensuring Sustainable Evaluation: How to Improve Quality of Evaluating Grant Proposals?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Andreas Rehs, 2020. "A structural topic model approach to scientific reorientation of economics and chemistry after German reunification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1229-1251, November.
    4. Yue Zhang & Weiyan Wang & Zhiyi Zhang, 2017. "Journals, Please go Further!," Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(5), pages 104-105, July.
    5. Carlo Galli & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Stefano Guizzardi, 2020. "Striving for Modernity: Layout and Abstracts in the Biomedical Literature," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2024. "Reluctance to pursue breakthrough research: A signaling explanation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    7. , Aisdl, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," OSF Preprints 9nbyr, Center for Open Science.
    8. Stefano Guizzardi & Maria Teresa Colangelo & Prisco Mirandola & Carlo Galli, 2023. "The Evolution of Narrativity in Abstracts of the Biomedical Literature between 1989 and 2022," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Kai Li & Chenyue Jiao, 2022. "The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 834-846, June.
    10. Veronika Oravcová & Kateryna Yakovenko & Matúš Mišík, 2022. "Complete but Fragmented: Research on Energy in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," Thesis Commons msy6e, Center for Open Science.
    12. Stefano Mammola & Diego Fontaneto & Alejandro Martínez & Filipe Chichorro, 2021. "Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 785-799, January.
    13. Carlo Galli & Stefano Guizzardi, 2020. "Change in Format, Register and Narration Style in the Biomedical Literature: A 1948 Example," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Rayanne Barros Setubal & Daniel Silva Farias & Clarice Casa Nova & Anna Carolina Fornero Aguiar & Tauany Aparecida Silva Santa Rosa Rodrigues & Rafael Teixeira Santos Lira & Anderson Luiz Vargas Ferre, 2022. "Microwave effect: analyzing citations from classic theories and their reinventions—a case study from a classic paper in aquatic ecology—Brooks & Dodson, 1965," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4751-4767, August.
    15. Yadav, Pratyush & Pervin, Nargis, 2022. "Towards efficient navigation in digital libraries: Leveraging popularity, semantics and communities to recommend scholarly articles," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:2-:d:1318386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.