IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i3p305-d324753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolving Indeterminacy Approach to Solve Multi-Criteria Zero-Sum Matrix Games with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Goals

Author

Listed:
  • M. G. Brikaa

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China
    Department of Basic Science Faculty of Computers & Informatics, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt)

  • Zhoushun Zheng

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China)

  • El-Saeed Ammar

    (Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt)

Abstract

The intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) is applied in various decision-making problems to express vagueness and showed great success in realizing the day-to-day problems. The principal aim of this article is to develop an approach for solving multi-criteria matrix game with intuitionistic fuzzy (I-fuzzy) goals. The proposed approach introduces the indeterminacy resolving functions of I-fuzzy numbers and discusses the I-fuzzy inequalities concept. Then, an effective algorithm based on the indeterminacy resolving algorithm is developed to obtain Pareto optimal security strategies for both players through solving a pair of multi-objective linear programming problems constructed from two auxiliary I-fuzzy programming problems. It is shown that this multi-criteria matrix game with I-fuzzy goals is an extension of the multi-criteria matrix game with fuzzy goals. Moreover, two numerical simulations are conducted to demonstrate the applicability and implementation process of the proposed algorithm. Finally, the achieved numerical results are compared with the existing algorithms to show the advantages of our algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • M. G. Brikaa & Zhoushun Zheng & El-Saeed Ammar, 2020. "Resolving Indeterminacy Approach to Solve Multi-Criteria Zero-Sum Matrix Games with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Goals," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-30, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:305-:d:324753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/3/305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/3/305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Li, Deng-Feng, 2012. "A fast approach to compute fuzzy values of matrix games with payoffs of triangular fuzzy numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 421-429.
    3. Sankar Kumar Roy & Ankan Bhaumik, 2018. "Intelligent Water Management: a Triangular Type-2 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Matrix Games Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 949-968, February.
    4. Wade D. Cook, 1976. "Zero‐sum games with multiple goals," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 615-621, December.
    5. Karima Fahem & Mohammed Radjef, 2015. "Properly efficient Nash equilibrium in multicriteria noncooperative games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 82(2), pages 175-193, October.
    6. Mijanur Rahaman Seikh & Prasun Kumar Nayak & Madhumangal Pal, 2013. "Matrix games in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(6), pages 693-708.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunguang Bai & Joseph Sarkis, 2013. "Green information technology strategic justification and evaluation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 831-847, November.
    2. Huiping Chen & Guiqiong Xu & Pingle Yang, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Shuying Li & Guoping Tu, 2022. "Probabilistic Linguistic Matrix Game Based on Fuzzy Envelope and Prospect Theory with Its Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Sarka Hoskova-Mayerova & Madeline Al Tahan & Bijan Davvaz, 2020. "Fuzzy Multi-Hypergroups," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Soumen Kumar Das & Magfura Pervin & Sankar Kumar Roy & Gerhard Wilhelm Weber, 2023. "Multi-objective solid transportation-location problem with variable carbon emission in inventory management: a hybrid approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 283-309, May.
    6. Chandra, S. & Aggarwal, A., 2015. "On solving matrix games with pay-offs of triangular fuzzy numbers: Certain observations and generalizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 575-581.
    7. Gaurav Sharma & Sapan Kumar Das & Ganesh Kumar, 2023. "Solving zero-sum two-person game with triangular fuzzy number payoffs using new fully fuzzy linear programming models," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1456-1487, September.
    8. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuping, 2015. "Green supply chain practices evaluation in the mining industry using a joint rough sets and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 86-100.
    9. Sanjiv Kumar & Ritika Chopra & Ratnesh R. Saxena, 2016. "A Fast Approach to Solve Matrix Games with Payoffs of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(06), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Bertrand Crettez & Naila Hayek & Peter M. Kort, 2021. "A Dynamic Multi-Objective Duopoly Game with Capital Accumulation and Pollution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-34, August.
    11. Armita Khorsandi & Bing-Yuan Cao & Hadi Nasseri, 2019. "A New Method to Optimize the Satisfaction Level of the Decision Maker in Fuzzy Geometric Programming Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Hüseyin Akay & Müsteyde Baduna Koçyiğit, 2021. "An Approach for Determination of the Drainage Network Effect on GIUH Using Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3873-3902, September.
    13. Naouel Yousfi-Halimi & Mohammed Said Radjef & Hachem Slimani, 2018. "Refinement of pure Pareto Nash equilibria in finite multicriteria games using preference relations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 607-628, August.
    14. Chunsheng Cui & Zhongwei Feng & Chunqiao Tan, 2018. "Credibilistic Loss Aversion Nash Equilibrium for Bimatrix Games with Triangular Fuzzy Payoffs," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-16, December.
    15. Shyamali Ghosh & Sankar Kumar Roy & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2023. "Interactive strategy of carbon cap-and-trade policy on sustainable multi-objective solid transportation problem with twofold uncertain waste management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 157-197, July.
    16. Huijuan Wang & Xin Wang & Lidong Wang, 2019. "Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Archimedean Bonferroni Mean Operators of Hesitant Fermatean 2-Tuple Linguistic Terms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-19, December.
    17. Ankan Bhaumik & Sankar Kumar Roy & Gerhard Wilhelm Weber, 2020. "Hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-linguistic term set approach in Prisoners’ dilemma game theory using TOPSIS: a case study on Human-trafficking," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 797-816, June.
    18. Harish Garg & Gagandeep Kaur, 2018. "Algorithm for Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Based on Aggregation Operators with New Distance Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Deng, Xinyang & Liu, Qi & Deng, Yong, 2016. "Matrix games with payoffs of belief structures," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 868-879.
    20. Andreas H. Hamel & Andreas Löhne, 2018. "A set optimization approach to zero-sum matrix games with multi-dimensional payoffs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(3), pages 369-397, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:305-:d:324753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.